LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flex_array: Change behaviour on zero size allocations
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:31:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296491497.7797.3792.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110131085213.GK3070@secunet.com>
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:52 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> int flex_array_put(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr, void *src,
> gfp_t flags)
> {
> - int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
> + int part_nr;
> struct flex_array_part *part;
> void *dst;
>
> + if (!fa->element_size)
> + return 0;
> if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
> return -ENOSPC;
I think this still has some of the issues of the earlier patch. The
zero-size check needs to be moved after the ->total_nr_elements check.
Otherwise, this won't produce any errors:
fa = flex_array_alloc(0, 100, GFP_KERNEL);
flex_array_put(fa, 1001, ptr, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -284,6 +297,8 @@ void *flex_array_get(struct flex_array *fa, unsigned int element_nr)
> int part_nr = fa_element_to_part_nr(fa, element_nr);
> struct flex_array_part *part;
>
> + if (!fa->total_nr_elements || !fa->element_size)
> + return NULL;
> if (element_nr >= fa->total_nr_elements)
> return NULL;
> if (elements_fit_in_base(fa))
Do you really need to check fa->total_nr_elements both for zero and
against element_nr? Seems a but superfluous to me.
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 8:52 Steffen Klassert
2011-01-31 16:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2011-02-01 10:24 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-02-01 11:03 ` Steffen Klassert
2011-02-01 14:55 ` Dave Hansen
2011-02-01 15:20 ` Eric Paris
2011-02-02 7:55 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296491497.7797.3792.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] flex_array: Change behaviour on zero size allocations' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).