LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <email@example.com>
To: Alan Stern <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Brendan Cully <email@example.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"SUZUKI, Kazuhiro" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/2] Fix hangup after creating checkpoint on Xen.
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:34:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 11:00 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:42 +0000, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > In fact there already is a "fast suspend & resume" path in the PM core.
> > > It's the freeze/thaw procedure used when starting to hibernate. The
> > > documentation specifically says that drivers' freeze methods are
> > > supposed to quiesce their devices but not change power levels. In
> > > addition, the thaw method is invoked as part of recovery from a failed
> > > hibernation attempt, so it already has the "cancel" semantics that xen
> > > seems to want.
> > Sounds like that would work and I would much prefer to simply make
> > correct use of the core functionality.
> It seems like a reasonable approach. Whether it will actually _work_
> is a harder question... :-)
> > So PMSG_FREEZE is balanced by either PMSG_RECOVER or PMSG_THAW depending
> > on whether the suspend was cancelled or not?
> Basically yes. It is also "balanced" by PMSG_RESTORE, which is used
> after a memory image has been restored (although this isn't relevant to
> your snapshotting). See the comments in include/linux/pm.h.
The documentation of the individual events in pm.h is good. Is there a
reference for the sequence of events for the different types of
> > So the sequence of events
> > is something like:
> > dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
> > dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_FREEZE);
> > sysdev_suspend(PMSG_QUIESCE);
> This should say sysdev_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE).
> > cancelled = suspend_hypercall()
> At this point swsusp_arch_suspend() is called. If that translates to
> suspend_hypercall() in your setting, then yes.
> > sysdev_resume();
> > dpm_resume_noirq(cancelled ? PMSG_RECOVER : PMSG_THAW);
> > dpm_resume_end(cancelled ? PMSG_RECOVER : PMSG_THAW);
> > ?
Both of those call ->thaw ->complete. Did I mean "cancelled ?
PMSG_THAW : PMSG_RESTORE"? (or s/THAW/RECOVER?)
If the suspend was cancelled then we want the devices to simply pickup
where they were before the freeze, wereas if we really did suspend (or
migrate or whatever) then they need to do a more complete reset and
reconnect operation so we want some sort of indication to the driver
> > (For comparison we currently have:
> > > > > dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > > > >
> > > > > dpm_suspend_noirq(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > > > >
> > > > > sysdev_suspend(PMSG_SUSPEND);
> > > > > /* suspend hypercall */
> > > > > sysdev_resume();
> > > > >
> > > > > dpm_resume_noirq(PMSG_RESUME);
> > > > >
> > > > > dpm_resume_end(PMSG_RESUME);
> > )
> Right. The sequence of calls is the same, but the PMSG_ argument is
> different so drivers are expected to act differently in response.
The drivers don't actually see the PMSG_* though right? They only see a
differing sequence of hooks from dev_pm_ops called.
> Alan Stern
Current Noise: Sworn Amongst - Useless
A condition in which presence of mind is good, but absence of
body is better.
-- Foolish Dictionary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <email@example.com>
2011-02-07 9:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-08 11:22 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-08 16:46 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-02-08 17:35 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-09 23:16 ` Brendan Cully
2011-02-09 23:42 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-10 11:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-02-10 16:00 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-10 16:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 16:34 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-02-10 17:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-10 18:56 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-10 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-02-10 17:53 ` Brendan Cully
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--subject='Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/2] Fix hangup after creating checkpoint on Xen.' \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).