LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/30] amd64_edac: Sanitize f10_get_base_addr_offset
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:15:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297358133-14320-8-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297358133-14320-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>

From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>

This function maps the system address to the normalized DCT address.
Document what the code does for more clarity and wrap insane bitmasks in
a more understandable macro which generates them. Also, reduce number of
arguments passed to the function. Finally, rename this function to what
it actually does.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c |   83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |   15 +++-----
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index d9e951c..32e3231 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -460,13 +460,12 @@ int amd64_get_dram_hole_info(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u64 *hole_base,
 	}
 
 	/* valid for Fam10h and above */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x10 &&
-	    (pvt->dhar & DRAM_MEM_HOIST_VALID) == 0) {
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x10 && !dhar_mem_hoist_valid(pvt)) {
 		debugf1("  Dram Memory Hoisting is DISABLED on this system\n");
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	if ((pvt->dhar & DHAR_VALID) == 0) {
+	if (!dhar_valid(pvt)) {
 		debugf1("  Dram Memory Hoisting is DISABLED on this node %d\n",
 			pvt->mc_node_id);
 		return 1;
@@ -859,8 +858,7 @@ static void dump_misc_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
 			(boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf) ? k8_dhar_offset(pvt)
 						   : f10_dhar_offset(pvt));
 
-	debugf1("  DramHoleValid: %s\n",
-		(pvt->dhar & DHAR_VALID) ? "yes" : "no");
+	debugf1("  DramHoleValid: %s\n", dhar_valid(pvt) ? "yes" : "no");
 
 	amd64_debug_display_dimm_sizes(0, pvt);
 
@@ -1238,30 +1236,53 @@ static u8 f10_determine_channel(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u64 sys_addr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/* See F10h BKDG, 2.8.10.2 DctSelBaseOffset Programming */
-static inline u64 f10_get_base_addr_offset(u64 sys_addr, bool hi_range_sel,
-						 u32 dct_sel_base_addr,
-						 u64 dct_sel_base_off,
-						 u32 hole_valid, u64 hole_off,
-						 u64 dram_base)
+/* Convert the sys_addr to the normalized DCT address */
+static u64 f10_get_norm_dct_addr(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int range,
+				 u64 sys_addr, bool hi_rng,
+				 u32 dct_sel_base_addr)
 {
 	u64 chan_off;
+	u64 dram_base		= get_dram_base(pvt, range);
+	u64 hole_off		= f10_dhar_offset(pvt);
+	u32 hole_valid		= dhar_valid(pvt);
+	u64 dct_sel_base_off	= (pvt->dct_sel_hi & 0xFFFFFC00) << 16;
 
-	if (hi_range_sel) {
-		if (!(dct_sel_base_addr & 0xFFFF0000) &&
-		   hole_valid && (sys_addr >= 0x100000000ULL))
+	if (hi_rng) {
+		/*
+		 * if
+		 * base address of high range is below 4Gb
+		 * (bits [47:27] at [31:11])
+		 * DRAM address space on this DCT is hoisted above 4Gb	&&
+		 * sys_addr > 4Gb
+		 *
+		 *	remove hole offset from sys_addr
+		 * else
+		 *	remove high range offset from sys_addr
+		 */
+		if ((!(dct_sel_base_addr >> 16) ||
+		     dct_sel_base_addr < dhar_base(pvt)) &&
+		    hole_valid &&
+		    (sys_addr >= BIT_64(32)))
 			chan_off = hole_off;
 		else
 			chan_off = dct_sel_base_off;
 	} else {
-		if (hole_valid && (sys_addr >= 0x100000000ULL))
+		/*
+		 * if
+		 * we have a valid hole		&&
+		 * sys_addr > 4Gb
+		 *
+		 *	remove hole
+		 * else
+		 *	remove dram base to normalize to DCT address
+		 */
+		if (hole_valid && (sys_addr >= BIT_64(32)))
 			chan_off = hole_off;
 		else
-			chan_off = dram_base & 0xFFFFF8000000ULL;
+			chan_off = dram_base;
 	}
 
-	return (sys_addr & 0x0000FFFFFFFFFFC0ULL) -
-			(chan_off & 0x0000FFFFFF800000ULL);
+	return (sys_addr & GENMASK(6,47)) - (chan_off & GENMASK(23,47));
 }
 
 /* Hack for the time being - Can we get this from BIOS?? */
@@ -1346,30 +1367,17 @@ static int f10_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int range,
 				  u64 sys_addr, int *nid, int *chan_sel)
 {
 	int cs_found = -EINVAL;
-	u64 chan_addr, dct_sel_base_off;
-	u64 hole_off;
-	u32 hole_valid, tmp, dct_sel_base;
+	u64 chan_addr;
+	u32 tmp, dct_sel_base;
 	u8 channel;
 	bool high_range = false;
 
 	u8 node_id    = dram_dst_node(pvt, range);
 	u8 intlv_en   = dram_intlv_en(pvt, range);
 	u32 intlv_sel = dram_intlv_sel(pvt, range);
-	u64 dram_base = get_dram_base(pvt, range);
-
-	debugf1("(range %d) Base=0x%llx SystemAddr= 0x%llx Limit=0x%llx\n",
-		range, dram_base, sys_addr, get_dram_limit(pvt, range));
-
-	/*
-	 * This assumes that one node's DHAR is the same as all the other
-	 * nodes' DHAR.
-	 */
-	hole_off = f10_dhar_offset(pvt);
-	hole_valid = (pvt->dhar & DHAR_VALID);
-	dct_sel_base_off = (pvt->dct_sel_hi & 0xFFFFFC00) << 16;
 
-	debugf1("   HoleOffset=0x%016llx  HoleValid=%d IntlvSel=0x%x\n",
-			hole_off, hole_valid, intlv_sel);
+	debugf1("(range %d) SystemAddr= 0x%llx Limit=0x%llx\n",
+		range, sys_addr, get_dram_limit(pvt, range));
 
 	if (intlv_en &&
 	    (intlv_sel != ((sys_addr >> 12) & intlv_en)))
@@ -1388,9 +1396,8 @@ static int f10_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int range,
 
 	channel = f10_determine_channel(pvt, sys_addr, high_range, intlv_en);
 
-	chan_addr = f10_get_base_addr_offset(sys_addr, high_range, dct_sel_base,
-					     dct_sel_base_off, hole_valid,
-					     hole_off, dram_base);
+	chan_addr = f10_get_norm_dct_addr(pvt, range, sys_addr,
+					  high_range, dct_sel_base);
 
 	/* remove Node ID (in case of memory interleaving) */
 	tmp = chan_addr & 0xFC0;
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
index 1964f89..ba18183 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -184,18 +184,13 @@
 #define dram_dst_node(pvt, i)		(pvt->ranges[i].lim.lo & 0x7)
 
 #define DHAR				0xf0
-#define DHAR_VALID			BIT(0)
-#define DRAM_MEM_HOIST_VALID		BIT(1)
+#define dhar_valid(pvt)			((pvt)->dhar & BIT(0))
+#define dhar_mem_hoist_valid(pvt)	((pvt)->dhar & BIT(1))
+#define dhar_base(pvt)			((pvt)->dhar & 0xff000000)
+#define k8_dhar_offset(pvt)		(((pvt)->dhar & 0x0000ff00) << 16)
 
-#define DHAR_BASE_MASK			0xff000000
-#define dhar_base(pvt)			((pvt)->dhar & DHAR_BASE_MASK)
-
-#define K8_DHAR_OFFSET_MASK		0x0000ff00
-#define k8_dhar_offset(pvt)		(((pvt)->dhar & K8_DHAR_OFFSET_MASK) << 16)
-
-#define F10_DHAR_OFFSET_MASK		0x0000ff80
 					/* NOTE: Extra mask bit vs K8 */
-#define f10_dhar_offset(pvt)		(((pvt)->dhar & F10_DHAR_OFFSET_MASK) << 16)
+#define f10_dhar_offset(pvt)		(((pvt)->dhar & 0x0000ff80) << 16)
 
 #define DCT_CFG_SEL			0x10C
 
-- 
1.7.4.rc2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-10 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-10 17:15 [PATCH 00/30] amd64_edac: Add Bulldozer support Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 01/30] EDAC: Shut up sysfs registration debug code Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 02/30] amd64_edac: Add support for F15h DCT PCI config accesses Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 03/30] amd64_edac: Remove DRAM base/limit subfields caching Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 04/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup DHAR handling Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 05/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup chipselect handling Borislav Petkov
2011-03-29 14:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-03-29 15:16     ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-29 15:39       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-03-29 16:02         ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-29 17:32           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 06/30] amd64_edac: Sanitize channel extraction Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 08/30] amd64_edac: Replace huge bitmasks with a macro Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 09/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup DBAM handling Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 10/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup Dram Configuration registers handling Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 11/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup DCT Select Low/High code Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 12/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup NBCTL code Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 13/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup NBCFG handling Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 14/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup NBSH cruft Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 15/30] amd64_edac: Cleanup old defines cruft Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 16/30] amd64_edac: Adjust channel counting to F15h Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 17/30] amd64_edac: Simplify decoding path Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 18/30] amd64_edac: Unify get_error_address Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 19/30] amd64_edac: Add support for interleaved region swapping Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 20/30] amd64_edac: Correct node interleaving removal Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 21/30] amd64_edac: Fix channel interleave removal Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 22/30] amd64_edac: Revamp online spare handling Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 23/30] amd64_edac: Beef up early exit reporting Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 24/30] amd64_edac: Adjust sys_addr to chip select conversion routine to F15h Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 25/30] amd64_edac: Sanitize ->read_dram_ctl_register Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 26/30] amd64_edac: Improve DRAM address mapping Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 27/30] PCI: Rename CPU PCI id define Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 28/30] amd64_edac: Simplify scrubrate setting Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 29/30] amd64_edac: Adjust ECC symbol size to F15h Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 17:15 ` [PATCH 30/30] amd64_edac: Enable driver on F15h Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 18:56 ` [PATCH 00/30] amd64_edac: Add Bulldozer support Greg KH
2011-02-10 19:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-02-10 19:22     ` Jesse Barnes
2011-02-10 21:43       ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297358133-14320-8-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 07/30] amd64_edac: Sanitize f10_get_base_addr_offset' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).