LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
	rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com,
	ankita@in.ibm.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:28:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297711715-3086-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297711715-3086-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

* Separate out numa_add_memblk_to() from numa_add_memblk() so that
  different numa_meminfo can be used.

* Rename cmdline to emu_cmdline.

* Drop @start/last_pfn from numa_emulation() and use max_pfn directly.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior change.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index b3c1418..10544c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -193,10 +193,9 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+static int __init numa_add_memblk_to(int nid, u64 start, u64 end,
+				     struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
-	struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
-
 	/* ignore zero length blks */
 	if (start == end)
 		return 0;
@@ -227,6 +226,11 @@ static void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 		(mi->nr_blks - idx) * sizeof(mi->blk[0]));
 }
 
+int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+	return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
+}
+
 /* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
 void __init
 setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
@@ -537,11 +541,11 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 /* Numa emulation */
 static struct bootnode nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
 static struct bootnode physnodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __cpuinitdata;
-static char *cmdline __initdata;
+static char *emu_cmdline __initdata;
 
 void __init numa_emu_cmdline(char *str)
 {
-	cmdline = str;
+	emu_cmdline = str;
 }
 
 int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
@@ -859,12 +863,10 @@ static int __init split_nodes_size_interleave(u64 addr, u64 max_addr, u64 size)
  * Sets up the system RAM area from start_pfn to last_pfn according to the
  * numa=fake command-line option.
  */
-static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
-			unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd)
+static int __init numa_emulation(int acpi, int amd)
 {
 	static struct numa_meminfo ei __initdata;
-	u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+	const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int num_nodes;
 	int i;
 
@@ -873,16 +875,16 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 	 * the fixed node size.  Otherwise, if it is just a single number N,
 	 * split the system RAM into N fake nodes.
 	 */
-	if (strchr(cmdline, 'M') || strchr(cmdline, 'G')) {
+	if (strchr(emu_cmdline, 'M') || strchr(emu_cmdline, 'G')) {
 		u64 size;
 
-		size = memparse(cmdline, &cmdline);
-		num_nodes = split_nodes_size_interleave(addr, max_addr, size);
+		size = memparse(emu_cmdline, &emu_cmdline);
+		num_nodes = split_nodes_size_interleave(0, max_addr, size);
 	} else {
 		unsigned long n;
 
-		n = simple_strtoul(cmdline, NULL, 0);
-		num_nodes = split_nodes_interleave(addr, max_addr, n);
+		n = simple_strtoul(emu_cmdline, NULL, 0);
+		num_nodes = split_nodes_interleave(0, max_addr, n);
 	}
 
 	if (num_nodes < 0)
@@ -913,7 +915,7 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
 						nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
 	}
-	setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr);
+	setup_physnodes(0, max_addr);
 	fake_physnodes(acpi, amd, num_nodes);
 	numa_init_array();
 	numa_emu_dist = true;
@@ -969,7 +971,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
 			continue;
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
 		setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
-		if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
+		if (emu_cmdline && !numa_emulation(i == 0, i == 1))
 			return;
 		setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
 		nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
-- 
1.7.1


  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-14 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-14 19:28 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86-64, NUMA: Build and use direct emulated nid -> phys nid mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 16:36   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86-64, NUMA: Make emulation code build numa_meminfo and share the registration path Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap node ID during emulation Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86-64, NUMA: Emulate directly from numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated apicid -> node mapping transformation Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86-64, NUMA: Unify emulated distance mapping Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 20:00 ` [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA emulation Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15  2:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15  5:44     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15  9:26   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297711715-3086-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64, NUMA: Trivial changes to prepare for emulation updates' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).