LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mattias Wallin <Mattias.Wallin@stericsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCHv5 0/3] Constant udelay() for SMP and non-SMP systems
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2011 16:56:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302047800-26720-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)

Note: I will submit this to the patch tracker in 48 hours.
Tested by are appreciated.

These patches fix the udelay() issue pointed out on
arm-lkml[1][2]. A quick recap: some SMP machines can scale
their CPU frequencies independent of one another. loops_per_jiffy
is calibrated globally and used in __const_udelay(). If one CPU
is running faster than what the loops_per_jiffy is calculated
(or scaled) for, udelay() will be incorrect and not wait long
enough (or too long). A similar problem occurs if the cpu
frequency is scaled during a udelay() call.

We could fix this issue a couple ways, wholesale replacement
of __udelay() and __const_udelay() (see [2] for that approach),
or replacement of __delay() (this series). Option 1 can fail if
anybody uses udelay() before memory is mapped and also duplicates
most of the code in asm/delay.h. It also needs to hardcode the
timer tick frequency, which can sometimes be inaccurate. The
benefit is that loops_per_jiffy stays the same and thus BogoMIPS
is unchanged.  Option 2 cannot fail since the __delay() loop is
repointed after memory is mapped in, but it suffers from a low
BogoMIPS when timers are clocked slowly. It also more accurately
calculates the timer tick frequency through the use of
calibrate_delay_direct().

-- Reference --
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/977567
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/78496 

Changes since v4:
 * Rebased against changes to udelay.S

Changes since v3:
 * Inlined set_delay_fn()

Changes since v2:
 * Additional patch using the timer based delay

Changes since v1:
 * likely() in delay.c
 * comment fixup for read_current_timer_delay_loop()
 * cosmetic improvements to commit text

Stephen Boyd (3):
  ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
  ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
  ARM: Implement a timer based __delay() loop

 arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h |   11 +++++-
 arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c   |    4 --
 arch/arm/lib/delay.S         |   69 ---------------------------------
 arch/arm/lib/delay.c         |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/lib/delay.S
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/lib/delay.c

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


             reply	other threads:[~2011-04-05 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-05 23:56 Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 1/3] ARM: Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
2011-04-06  8:49   ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-06 17:34     ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07  1:27     ` Saravana Kannan
2011-04-07  7:27       ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-07  7:29   ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07  7:30   ` Mattias Wallin
2011-04-05 23:56 ` [PATCHv5 3/3] ARM: Implement a timer based __delay() loop Stephen Boyd
2011-04-07  7:30   ` Mattias Wallin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302047800-26720-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Mattias.Wallin@stericsson.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).