LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:02:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302134569-22825-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> (raw)
This series aims to consolidate OMAP and SH-mobile runtime PM
implementations around the new device power domains.
In 2.6.39, device power domains were added (commit
7538e3db6e015e890825fbd9f8659952896ddd5b, PM: add support for device
power domains). In converting both OMAP and SH-mobile to use device
power domains, the overlap between implementations was almost 100%.
To share the runtime PM implementation based on simple clock gating,
move it to arch/arm/common and initialize it from OMAP and SH-mobile.
Also, OMAP was the only user of platform_bus_set_pm_ops(). Now that
it has been converted to device power domains, remove
platform_bus_set_pm_ops().
Kevin Hilman (6):
ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains
OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power
domains
OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation
ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other
platforms
ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile &
OMAP1
Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of
dev_pm_ops"
arch/arm/common/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/common/pm_runtime_clock.c | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/pm_runtime.h | 17 ++++
arch/arm/mach-omap1/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c | 100 --------------------
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_runtime.c | 18 ++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 6 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c | 85 -----------------
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c | 152 +-----------------------------
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 22 +++++
drivers/base/platform.c | 35 -------
include/linux/platform_device.h | 3 -
12 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 376 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/common/pm_runtime_clock.c
create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/pm_runtime.h
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_runtime.c
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c
--
1.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 0:02 Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile & OMAP1 Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1302134569-22825-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@suse.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).