LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC v2] sched: completion: lock-free checking of the blocking case
@ 2015-01-24 12:49 Nicholas Mc Guire
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nicholas Mc Guire @ 2015-01-24 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, Nicholas Mc Guire
The "thread would block" case can be checked without grabbing the lock
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
---
v2: return type is boot thus return should be false not 0 here
Reported-by kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
If the check does not return early then grab the lock and recheck.
A memory barrier is not needed as complete() and complete_all() imply
a barrier.
The ACCESS_ONCE is needed for calls in a loop that, if inlined, could
optimize out the re-fetching of x->done.
kernel/sched/completion.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/completion.c b/kernel/sched/completion.c
index 7c5cd70..5f7cf31 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/completion.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c
@@ -268,6 +268,15 @@ bool try_wait_for_completion(struct completion *x)
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 1;
+ /*
+ * Since x->done will need to be locked only
+ * in the non-blocking case, we check x->done
+ * first without taking the lock so we can
+ * return early in the blocking case.
+ */
+ if (!ACCESS_ONCE(x->done))
+ return false;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&x->wait.lock, flags);
if (!x->done)
ret = 0;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-01-24 12:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-24 12:49 [PATCH RFC v2] sched: completion: lock-free checking of the blocking case Nicholas Mc Guire
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).