LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/16] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 13:44:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425300248-40277-16-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425300248-40277-1-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The patch introduces routine s390_facility_test() which allows to
verify a specific facility bit is set.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
target-s390x/cpu-models.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target-s390x/cpu-models.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
index 7ad61df..5c4eac5 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.c
@@ -698,3 +698,33 @@ bool s390_cpu_models_used(void)
{
return cpu_models_used;
}
+
+static inline int test_facility(uint64_t *fac_list, uint16_t nr)
+{
+ uint16_t word = nr / BITS_PER_LONG;
+ uint16_t be_bit = (BITS_PER_LONG - 1) - (nr % BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+ return (nr < FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT1) ?
+ (fac_list[word] >> be_bit) & __UINT64_C(1) : 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * s390_test_facility:
+ * @nr: facility bit number to test
+ * @cc: cpu class to test
+ *
+ * The functions tests if the cpu facility identified by bit @nr is available
+ * to the cpu class @cc.
+ *
+ * Returns: a boolean value.
+ *
+ * Since: 2.3
+ */
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr)
+{
+ if (!cc) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ return test_facility(cc->fac_list, nr) ? true : false;
+}
+
diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
index 3605aa4..557f5e5 100644
--- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
+++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ bool s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void);
bool s390_probe_mode(void);
void s390_cpu_model_init(S390CPUClass *cc);
bool s390_cpu_models_used(void);
+bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, uint16_t nr);
/*
* bits 0-7 : CMOS generation
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 12:43 [PATCH v3 00/16] s390x cpu model implementation Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] Introduce probe mode for machine type none Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 13:57 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-02 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 16:57 ` Andreas Färber
2015-03-03 10:55 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-04 19:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-05 14:56 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-05 15:07 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-02 19:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-03 10:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] Introduce option --probe to switch into probe mode Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] Introduce stub routine cpu_desc_avail Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] target-s390x: Introduce cpu facilities Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] target-s390x: Generate facility defines per cpu model Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] target-s390x: Introduce cpu models Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] target-s390x: Define cpu model specific facility lists Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] target-s390x: Add cpu model alias definition routines Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] target-s390x: Update linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] target-s390x: Add KVM VM attribute interface for cpu models Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] target-s390x: Add cpu class initialization routines Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] target-s390x: Prepare accelerator during cpu object realization Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] target-s390x: New QMP command query-cpu-model Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] target-s390x: Extend QMP command query-cpu-definitions Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 19:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-04 9:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 12:44 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2015-03-02 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] target-s390x: Enable cpu model usage Michael Mueller
2015-03-02 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] s390x cpu model implementation Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425300248-40277-16-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).