LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Kumar P, Mahesh" <mahesh.kumar.p@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:44:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425465893.14897.163.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F52C8E.2050705@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:37 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2015/2/23 20:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 23:49 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> This is the reworked patch series which had been sent earlier [1] to support
> >> Intel CherryTrail SoC.
> >>
> >> The patches were tested on both BayTrail and CherryTrail SoCs.
> >>
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5235891/
> >
> > Aubrey, is everything is clear for you now? Can I send v3 with your
> > Ack's?
> The patches overall look good to me, except a few minor comments need to
> be addressed in the last conversation. For example, I think we don't
> need patch 1/4 if we won't use dev_print.
We still use them. Like I said the patch has no relations to the series,
though it simplifies already existing function.
> some other changes might be
> necessary only if they makes code cleaner and works better.
Thus, I think the patch 1/4 is still useful.
> Certainly, it would be better if other x86 maintainers can take a look
> at these patches.
Agree.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 21:49 Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86: pmc_atom: save struct device pointer in pmc Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 3:42 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-01-22 9:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86: pmc_atom: print index of device in loop Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 3:45 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-01-22 9:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: pmc_atom: supply register mappings via pmc object Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-20 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PMC driver: Add Cherrytrail PMC interface Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-22 4:02 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-01-22 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-01-26 2:30 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-02-23 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support Andy Shevchenko
2015-03-02 6:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-03 3:37 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2015-03-30 13:05 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2015-03-31 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425465893.14897.163.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mahesh.kumar.p@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail support' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).