LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Len.Brown@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced platform
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 16:05:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425571502.3838.151.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8129220.9HmyqjfodP@vostro.rjw.lan>
> Besides, the "ACPI reduced hardware" case is kind of a red herring here,
> because it most likely is not the only case when we'll want has_8259_pic()
> to return 0 (quite likely, we'll want that on all BayTrail-based systems,
> for example).
No. Only those with ACPI reduced firmware. For others you do want to
touch the 8259.
It *is* about ACPI reduced.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 3:23 Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 5:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04 5:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 5:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04 6:04 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04 8:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-03-04 9:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-04 14:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-04 14:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-04 20:21 ` Alan Cox
2015-03-04 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-05 11:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 16:05 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2015-03-04 14:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2015-03-04 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-05 11:13 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-05 12:42 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-05 16:06 ` Alan Cox
2015-03-09 23:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-10 8:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-11 4:14 ` Li, Aubrey
2015-03-04 20:18 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425571502.3838.151.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Len.Brown@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced platform' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).