LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysfs: Refine is_visible API
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:22:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426098131-20106-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> (raw)

Up to now, is_visible can only be used to either remove visibility
of a file entirely or to add permissions, but not to reduce permissions.
This makes it impossible, for example, to use DEVICE_ATTR_RW to define
file attributes and reduce permissions to read-only.

This behavior is undesirable and unnecessarily complicates code which
needs to reduce permissions; instead of just returning the desired
permissions, it has to ensure that the permissions in the attribute
variable declaration only reflect the minimal permissions ever needed.

Change semantics of is_visible to only use the permissions returned
from it instead of oring the returned value with the hard-coded
permissions.

The code now dumps a warning to the console if an is_visible function
returns unexpected permissions.

Also document struct attribute_group.

Tested with v3.19-rc5.

v2: This patchset, originally from Guenter, includes the fixup for the
patch 2/3 discussed in the thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/20/877,
that is limiting the scope of attributes to SYSFS_PREALLOC | 0664, since
we want to avoid executable and world-writable sysfs files as well.

Rebased onto v4.0-rc3.

Guenter Roeck (2):
  sysfs: Use only return value from is_visible for the file mode
  sysfs: Document struct attribute_group

Vivien Didelot (1):
  sysfs: Only accept read/write permissions for file attributes

 fs/sysfs/group.c      | 11 ++++++++---
 include/linux/sysfs.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.3.2


             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-11 18:22 Vivien Didelot [this message]
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sysfs: Use only return value from is_visible for the file mode Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 10:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sysfs: Only accept read/write permissions for file attributes Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12  1:33   ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-12 10:01   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-12 10:39     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-12 13:43       ` Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 13:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-11 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sysfs: Document struct attribute_group Vivien Didelot
2015-03-12 10:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1426098131-20106-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysfs: Refine is_visible API' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).