LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
To: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>
Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
"oss-security@lists.openwall.com"
<oss-security@lists.openwall.com>,
"<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org> (linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org)"
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2014-8159 kernel: infiniband: uverbs: unprotected physical memory access
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:40:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428007208.22575.104.camel@opteya.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM2PR05MB0929FB71C5A4DE92A7709F92DCF20@AM2PR05MB0929.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
Le jeudi 02 avril 2015 à 16:44 +0000, Shachar Raindel a écrit :
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yann Droneaud [mailto:ydroneaud@opteya.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 7:35 PM
> > Another related question: as the large memory range could be registered
> > by user space with ibv_reg_mr(pd, base, size, IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND),
> > what's prevent the kernel to map a file as the result of mmap(0, ...)
> > in this region, making it available remotely through IBV_WR_RDMA_READ /
> > IBV_WR_RDMA_WRITE ?
> >
>
> This is not a bug. This is a feature.
>
> Exposing a file through RDMA, using ODP, can be done exactly like this.
> Given that the application explicitly requested this behavior, I don't
> see why it is a problem.
If the application cannot choose what will end up in the region it has
registered, it's an issue !
What might happen if one library in a program call mmap(0, size, ...) to
load a file storing a secret (a private key), and that file ends up
being mapped in an registered but otherwise free region (afaict, the
kernel is allowed to do it) ?
What might happen if one library in a program call call mmap(0,
size, ..., MAP_ANONYMOUS,...) to allocate memory, call mlock(), then
write in this location a secret (a passphrase), and that area ends up
in the memory region registered for on demand paging ?
The application haven't choose to disclose these confidential piece of
information, but they are available for reading/writing by remote
through RDMA given it knows the rkey of the memory region (which is a
32bits value).
I hope I'm missing something, because I'm not feeling confident such
behavor is a feature.
> Actually, some of our tests use such flows.
> The mmu notifiers mechanism allow us to do this safely. When the page is
> written back to disk, it is removed from the ODP mapping. When it is
> accessed by the HCA, it is brought back to RAM.
>
I'm not discussing about the benefit of On Demand Paging and why it's a
very good feature to expose files through RDMA.
I'm trying to understand how the application can choose what is exposed
through RDMA if it registers a very large memory region for later use
(but do not actually explicitly map something there yet): what's the
consequences ?
void *start = sbrk(0);
size_t size = ULONG_MAX - (unsigned long)start;
ibv_reg_mr(pd, start, size, IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND)
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AM3PR05MB0935AABF569F15EA846B8E72DC000@AM3PR05MB0935.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
2015-04-02 10:04 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-02 10:52 ` Shachar Raindel
2015-04-02 13:30 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-02 15:18 ` Haggai Eran
2015-04-02 16:35 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-02 16:44 ` Shachar Raindel
2015-04-02 18:12 ` Haggai Eran
2015-04-13 13:29 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-14 8:11 ` Haggai Eran
2015-04-02 20:40 ` Yann Droneaud [this message]
2015-04-03 8:39 ` Haggai Eran
2015-04-03 11:49 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-02 15:15 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-02 16:34 ` Shachar Raindel
2015-04-08 12:19 ` Yann Droneaud
2015-04-08 12:44 ` Yann Droneaud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1428007208.22575.104.camel@opteya.com \
--to=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-security@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=raindel@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: CVE-2014-8159 kernel: infiniband: uverbs: unprotected physical memory access' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).