From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752720AbbBQRcE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:32:04 -0500
Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:62447 "HELO
	v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1751928AbbBQRcB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:32:01 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
        Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <syrjala@sci.fi>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        x86@kernel.org, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Fix regression caused by commit b568b8601f05
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:55:14 +0100
Message-ID: <14690730.85W95cg85M@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.19.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20150216193637.GA13497@amd>
References: <1424039150-4115-1-git-send-email-syrjala@sci.fi> <1424052673-22974-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <20150216193637.GA13497@amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:36:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2015-02-16 10:11:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> > accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
> 
> accidentaly?
> 
> > regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
> > nc6000 where we fail to register the ACPI interrupt, and thus
> > lose eg. thermal notifications leading a potentially overheated
> > machine.
> > 
> > So reintroduce support of legacy PIC based ACPI SCI interrupt.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <syrjala@sci.fi>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Is anyone taking care of this one or should I take it?

Ingo, Peter?


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.