LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Fix sb_rdonly() change
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:51:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511506294.8230.6.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873754i512.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 15:07 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 15:29 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > > Ouch forgot to add stable@
> > >
> > > --
> > > commit bc98a42c1f7d0f886c0c1b75a92a004976a46d9f introduced bug.
> >
> > I think your commit message needs a bit more information.
> >
> > It'd be useful to describe that the introduction of
> > sb_rdonly converted the bitwise & to a boolean and so
> > this conversion and comparison was made defective.
> >
> > Are there any other instances of defective comparisons?
>
> Please ask to that patch author.
The patch author, David Howells, is on the cc list.
btw:
It seems all the the other uses use a (bool) cast of the
(*flags & MS_RDONLY) and a comparison of sb_rdonly(sb).
It would make sense to change the argument type of the
ext[24]_setup_super int read_only arg to bool to match
the sb_rdonly() type.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-24 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-23 6:26 [PATCH] fat: Fix sb_rdonly() change OGAWA Hirofumi
2017-11-23 6:29 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2017-11-23 20:49 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-24 6:07 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2017-11-24 6:51 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-11-28 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511506294.8230.6.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).