[PATCH v10 0/5] set VSESR_EL2 by user space and support NOTIFY_SEI notification

[PATCH v10 0/5] set VSESR_EL2 by user space and support NOTIFY_SEI notification

[Dongjiu Geng]

1. Detect whether KVM can set set guest SError syndrome
2. Support to Set VSESR_EL2 and inject SError by user space.
3. Support live migration to keep SError pending state and VSESR_EL2 value.
4. ACPI 6.1 adds support for NOTIFY_SEI as a GHES notification mechanism, so support this
   notification in software, KVM or kernel ARCH code call handle_guest_sei() to let ACP driver
   to handle this notification.

Dongjiu Geng (5):
  arm64: KVM: Prepare set virtual SEI syndrome value
  arm64: KVM: export the capability to set guest SError syndrome
  arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce set and get per-vcpu event
  ACPI / APEI: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8
  arm64: handle NOTIFY_SEI notification by the APEI driver

 Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt    | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h      |  6 ++++
 arch/arm/kvm/guest.c                 | 12 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  5 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |  7 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h    | 10 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c            |  4 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c               | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c        |  5 ++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               |  4 +++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 10 +++++++
 drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig            | 15 ++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c             | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/ghes.h                  |  1 +
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h             |  1 +
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                   | 18 ++++++++++++
 17 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: KVM: Prepare set virtual SEI syndrome value

[Dongjiu Geng]

Export one API to specify virtual SEI syndrome value
for guest, and add a helper to get the VSESR_EL2 value.

Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h    | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c        | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 413dc82..3294885 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long hcr)
 	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 = hcr;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2;
+}
+
 static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
 {
 	vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2 = vsesr;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a73f63a..3dc49b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 int kvm_perf_init(void);
 int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
 
+void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome);
+
 struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
 
 static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
index 60666a0..78ecb28 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
@@ -186,3 +186,8 @@ void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, ESR_ELx_ISV);
 }
+
+void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome)
+{
+	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, syndrome & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
+}
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: KVM: Prepare set virtual SEI syndrome value

[James Morse]

Hi Dongjiu Geng,

On 03/03/18 16:09, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> Export one API to specify virtual SEI syndrome value
> for guest, and add a helper to get the VSESR_EL2 value.

This patch adds two helpers that nothing calls... its not big, please merge it
with the patch that uses these.


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 413dc82..3294885 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long hcr)
>  	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 = hcr;
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
>  {
>  	vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2 = vsesr;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a73f63a..3dc49b7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  int kvm_perf_init(void);
>  int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>  
> +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome);
> +
>  struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>  
>  static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> index 60666a0..78ecb28 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> @@ -186,3 +186,8 @@ void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, ESR_ELx_ISV);
>  }
> +
> +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome)
> +{
> +	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, syndrome & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);

If you move the ISS_MASK into pend_guest_serror(), you wouldn't need this at all.

It would be better if any validation were in the user-space helpers so we can
check user-space hasn't put something funny in the top bits.

> +}
> 


Thanks,

James

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: KVM: Prepare set virtual SEI syndrome value

[gengdongjiu]

Hi James,
   Thank you very much for this mail and your time to review this patch. Appreciate that.
I will check it and reply.


On 2018/3/16 4:37, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Dongjiu Geng,
> 
> On 03/03/18 16:09, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>> Export one API to specify virtual SEI syndrome value
>> for guest, and add a helper to get the VSESR_EL2 value.
> 
> This patch adds two helpers that nothing calls... its not big, please merge it
> with the patch that uses these.
> 
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> index 413dc82..3294885 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long hcr)
>>  	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 = hcr;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	return vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
>>  {
>>  	vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2 = vsesr;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index a73f63a..3dc49b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>>  int kvm_perf_init(void);
>>  int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>>  
>> +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome);
>> +
>>  struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>>  
>>  static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr,
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> index 60666a0..78ecb28 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> @@ -186,3 +186,8 @@ void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>>  	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, ESR_ELx_ISV);
>>  }
>> +
>> +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome)
>> +{
>> +	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, syndrome & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
> 
> If you move the ISS_MASK into pend_guest_serror(), you wouldn't need this at all.
> 
> It would be better if any validation were in the user-space helpers so we can
> check user-space hasn't put something funny in the top bits.
> 
>> +}
>>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James
> 
> .
> 

[PATCH v10 2/5] arm64: KVM: export the capability to set guest SError syndrome

[Dongjiu Geng]

Before user space injects a SError, it needs to know whether it can
specify the guest Exception Syndrome, so KVM should tell user space
whether it has such capability.

Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c            |  3 +++
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |  1 +
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index fc3ae95..8a3d708 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -4415,3 +4415,14 @@ Parameters: none
 This capability indicates if the flic device will be able to get/set the
 AIS states for migration via the KVM_DEV_FLIC_AISM_ALL attribute and allows
 to discover this without having to create a flic device.
+
+8.14 KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR
+
+Architectures: arm, arm64
+
+This capability indicates that userspace can specify syndrome value reported to
+guest OS when guest takes a virtual SError interrupt exception.
+If KVM has this capability, userspace can only specify the ISS field for the ESR
+syndrome, can not specify the EC field which is not under control by KVM.
+If this virtual SError is taken to EL1 using AArch64, this value will be reported
+into ISS filed of ESR_EL1.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 3256b92..38c8a64 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 	case KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3:
 		r = kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3();
 		break;
+	case KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR:
+		r = cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN);
+		break;
 	case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
 	case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
 		r = 1;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 8fb90a0..3587b33 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
 #define KVM_CAP_S390_AIS_MIGRATION 150
 #define KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_CPU_CHAR 151
 #define KVM_CAP_S390_BPB 152
+#define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 153
 
 #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
 
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v10 2/5] arm64: KVM: export the capability to set guest SError syndrome

[James Morse]

Hi Dongjiu Geng,

On 03/03/18 16:09, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> Before user space injects a SError, it needs to know whether it can
> specify the guest Exception Syndrome, so KVM should tell user space
> whether it has such capability.

> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index fc3ae95..8a3d708 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -4415,3 +4415,14 @@ Parameters: none
>  This capability indicates if the flic device will be able to get/set the
>  AIS states for migration via the KVM_DEV_FLIC_AISM_ALL attribute and allows
>  to discover this without having to create a flic device.
> +
> +8.14 KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR
> +
> +Architectures: arm, arm64
> +
> +This capability indicates that userspace can specify syndrome value reported to
> +guest OS when guest takes a virtual SError interrupt exception.

"when userspace triggers a virtual SError"... how?


> +If KVM has this capability, userspace can only specify the ISS field for the ESR
> +syndrome, can not specify the EC field which is not under control by KVM.

Where do I put the ESR?
If you re-order this after the patch that adds the API, you can describe how
this can be used.


Thanks,

James



> +If this virtual SError is taken to EL1 using AArch64, this value will be reported
> +into ISS filed of ESR_EL1.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index 3256b92..38c8a64 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  	case KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3:
>  		r = kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3();
>  		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR:
> +		r = cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN);
> +		break;
>  	case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
>  	case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
>  		r = 1;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 8fb90a0..3587b33 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -934,6 +934,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_AIS_MIGRATION 150
>  #define KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_CPU_CHAR 151
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_BPB 152
> +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 153
>  
>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
> 

[PATCH v10 3/5] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce set and get per-vcpu event

[Dongjiu Geng]

RAS Extension provides VSESR_EL2 register to specify
virtual SError syndrome value, this patch adds a new
IOCTL to export user-invisible states related to
SError exceptions. User space can setup the
kvm_vcpu_events to inject specified SError, also it
can support live migration.

Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  6 ++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/guest.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  5 +++++
 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c            | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c            |  1 +
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 8a3d708..26ae151 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -819,11 +819,13 @@ struct kvm_clock_data {
 
 Capability: KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
 Extended by: KVM_CAP_INTR_SHADOW
-Architectures: x86
+Architectures: x86, arm, arm64
 Type: vm ioctl
 Parameters: struct kvm_vcpu_event (out)
 Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
 
+X86:
+
 Gets currently pending exceptions, interrupts, and NMIs as well as related
 states of the vcpu.
 
@@ -865,15 +867,29 @@ Only two fields are defined in the flags field:
 - KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM may be set in the flags field to signal that
   smi contains a valid state.
 
+ARM, ARM64:
+
+Gets currently pending SError exceptions as well as related states of the vcpu.
+
+struct kvm_vcpu_events {
+       struct {
+               bool serror_pending;
+               bool serror_has_esr;
+               u64 serror_esr;
+       } exception;
+};
+
 4.32 KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
 
 Capability: KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
 Extended by: KVM_CAP_INTR_SHADOW
-Architectures: x86
+Architectures: x86, arm, arm64
 Type: vm ioctl
 Parameters: struct kvm_vcpu_event (in)
 Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
 
+X86:
+
 Set pending exceptions, interrupts, and NMIs as well as related states of the
 vcpu.
 
@@ -894,6 +910,12 @@ shall be written into the VCPU.
 
 KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM can only be set if KVM_CAP_X86_SMM is available.
 
+ARM, ARM64:
+
+Set pending SError exceptions as well as related states of the vcpu.
+
+See KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS for the data structure.
+
 
 4.33 KVM_GET_DEBUGREGS
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index ef54013..d81621e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
 int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *indices);
 int kvm_arm_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
 int kvm_arm_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
+
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
+
 unsigned long kvm_call_hyp(void *hypfn, ...);
 void force_vm_exit(const cpumask_t *mask);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
index 1e0784e..39f895d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
@@ -248,6 +248,18 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
 {
 	switch (read_cpuid_part()) {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 3dc49b7..1125540 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
 int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *indices);
 int kvm_arm_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
 int kvm_arm_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg);
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
+
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
 
 #define KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
 int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 9abbf30..32c0eae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #define __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG
 #define __KVM_HAVE_IRQ_LINE
 #define __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
+#define __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
 
 #define KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET 1
 
@@ -153,6 +154,15 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
 struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
 };
 
+/* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
+struct kvm_vcpu_events {
+	struct {
+		bool serror_pending;
+		bool serror_has_esr;
+		u64 serror_esr;
+	} exception;
+};
+
 /* If you need to interpret the index values, here is the key: */
 #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK		0x000000000FFF0000
 #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT	16
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 5c7f657..62d49c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -277,6 +277,32 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+{
+	events->exception.serror_pending = (vcpu_get_hcr(vcpu) & HCR_VSE);
+	events->exception.serror_has_esr =
+			cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN) &&
+					(!!vcpu_get_vsesr(vcpu));
+	events->exception.serror_esr = vcpu_get_vsesr(vcpu);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
+{
+	bool injected = events->exception.serror_pending;
+	bool has_esr = events->exception.serror_has_esr;
+
+	if (injected && has_esr)
+		kvm_set_sei_esr(vcpu, events->exception.serror_esr);
+	else if (injected)
+		kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
 {
 	unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 38c8a64..20e919a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 		break;
 	case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
 	case KVM_CAP_VCPU_ATTRIBUTES:
+	case KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS:
 		r = 1;
 		break;
 	default:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 7e3941f..30c56e0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -1051,6 +1051,24 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 			return -EFAULT;
 		return kvm_arm_vcpu_has_attr(vcpu, &attr);
 	}
+	case KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS: {
+		struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
+
+		kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(vcpu, &events);
+
+		if (copy_to_user(argp, &events, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_events)))
+			return -EFAULT;
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+	case KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS: {
+		struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
+
+		if (copy_from_user(&events, argp, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_events)))
+			return -EFAULT;
+
+		return kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(vcpu, &events);
+	}
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] arm/arm64: KVM: Introduce set and get per-vcpu event

[James Morse]

Hi Dongjiu Geng,

On 03/03/18 16:09, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> RAS Extension provides VSESR_EL2 register to specify
> virtual SError syndrome value, this patch adds a new
> IOCTL to export user-invisible states related to
> SError exceptions. User space can setup the
> kvm_vcpu_events to inject specified SError, also it
> can support live migration.

> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index 8a3d708..26ae151 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -819,11 +819,13 @@ struct kvm_clock_data {
>  
>  Capability: KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
>  Extended by: KVM_CAP_INTR_SHADOW
> -Architectures: x86
> +Architectures: x86, arm, arm64
>  Type: vm ioctl
>  Parameters: struct kvm_vcpu_event (out)
>  Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
>  
> +X86:
> +
>  Gets currently pending exceptions, interrupts, and NMIs as well as related
>  states of the vcpu.
>  
> @@ -865,15 +867,29 @@ Only two fields are defined in the flags field:
>  - KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM may be set in the flags field to signal that
>    smi contains a valid state.
>  
> +ARM, ARM64:
> +
> +Gets currently pending SError exceptions as well as related states of the vcpu.
> +
> +struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> +       struct {
> +               bool serror_pending;
> +               bool serror_has_esr;
> +               u64 serror_esr;
> +       } exception;
> +};

Don't put bool in an ABI struct. The encoding is up to the compiler.
The compiler will insert padding in this struct to make serror_esr naturally
aligned. Different compilers may do it differently. You'll see that the existing
struct kvm_vcpu_events has 'pad' fields to ensure each element in the struct is
naturally aligned.

serror_pending and serror_has_esr need to be in a flags field.

I thought the logic for re-using the CAP was so user-space could re-use
save/restore code to transfer whatever we put in here during migration. If the
struct is a different size the code has to be different anyway.
My understanding of Drew and Christoffer's comments was that we should re-use
the existing struct. (but now that I look at it, its not so clear).

(If we reuse the struct, we can put the esr in exception.error_code, if we can
get away with it: It would be good to union exception up with a u64, then use
that. This would let us transfer anything we need in those RES0 bits of the
64bit VSESR_EL2).


>  4.32 KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
>  
>  Capability: KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
>  Extended by: KVM_CAP_INTR_SHADOW
> -Architectures: x86
> +Architectures: x86, arm, arm64
>  Type: vm ioctl
>  Parameters: struct kvm_vcpu_event (in)
>  Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
>  
> +X86:
> +
>  Set pending exceptions, interrupts, and NMIs as well as related states of the
>  vcpu.
>  
> @@ -894,6 +910,12 @@ shall be written into the VCPU.
>  
>  KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM can only be set if KVM_CAP_X86_SMM is available.
>  
> +ARM, ARM64:
> +
> +Set pending SError exceptions as well as related states of the vcpu.
> +
> +See KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS for the data structure.
> +
>  
>  4.33 KVM_GET_DEBUGREGS
>  

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 9abbf30..32c0eae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_IRQ_LINE
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_READONLY_MEM
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
>  
>  #define KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET 1
>  
> @@ -153,6 +154,15 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
>  struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>  };
>  
> +/* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
> +struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> +	struct {
> +		bool serror_pending;
> +		bool serror_has_esr;
> +		u64 serror_esr;
> +	} exception;
> +};
> +

>  /* If you need to interpret the index values, here is the key: */
>  #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK		0x000000000FFF0000
>  #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT	16
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 5c7f657..62d49c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,32 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
> +{
> +	events->exception.serror_pending = (vcpu_get_hcr(vcpu) & HCR_VSE);
> +	events->exception.serror_has_esr =
> +			cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN) &&
> +					(!!vcpu_get_vsesr(vcpu));
> +	events->exception.serror_esr = vcpu_get_vsesr(vcpu);
> +
> +	return 0;

Nothing checks the return value. Why is it here?

> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
> +{
> +	bool injected = events->exception.serror_pending;
> +	bool has_esr = events->exception.serror_has_esr;

Could you validate 'events' describes something we support. What if
cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN) is false, we still call kvm_set_sei_esr().

Please check any parts of the struct that should be zero, are zero. This lets us
add new features, and reject attempts to migrate them (instead of silently
ignoring them).


> +	if (injected && has_esr)
> +		kvm_set_sei_esr(vcpu, events->exception.serror_esr);
> +	else if (injected)
> +		kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu);
> +
> +	return 0;

Nothing checks the return value. Why is it here?


> +}
> +
>  int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();


> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 7e3941f..30c56e0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1051,6 +1051,24 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  			return -EFAULT;
>  		return kvm_arm_vcpu_has_attr(vcpu, &attr);
>  	}
> +	case KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS: {
> +		struct kvm_vcpu_events events;

Please initialise events to 0 so that padding transferred to user-space doesn't
contain kernel stack.


> +		kvm_arm_vcpu_get_events(vcpu, &events);
> +
> +		if (copy_to_user(argp, &events, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_events)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	case KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS: {
> +		struct kvm_vcpu_events events;
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(&events, argp, sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_events)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		return kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(vcpu, &events);
> +	}
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 

Thanks,

James

[PATCH v10 4/5] ACPI / APEI: Add SEI notification type support for ARMv8

[Dongjiu Geng]

ACPI 6.x adds support for NOTIFY_SEI as a GHES notification
mechanism, so add new GHES notification handling functions.
Expose API ghes_notify_sei() to arch code, arch code will call
this API when it gets this NOTIFY_SEI.

Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig | 15 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c  | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/ghes.h       |  1 +
 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
index 52ae543..ff4afc3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
@@ -55,6 +55,21 @@ config ACPI_APEI_SEA
 	  option allows the OS to look for such hardware error record, and
 	  take appropriate action.
 
+config ACPI_APEI_SEI
+	bool "APEI SError(System Error) Interrupt logging/recovering support"
+	depends on ARM64 && ACPI_APEI_GHES
+	default y
+	help
+	  This option should be enabled if the system supports
+	  firmware first handling of SEI (SError interrupt).
+
+	  SEI happens with asynchronous external abort for errors on device
+	  memory reads on ARMv8 systems. If a system supports firmware first
+	  handling of SEI, the platform analyzes and handles hardware error
+	  notifications from SEI, and it may then form a hardware error record for
+	  the OS to parse and handle. This option allows the OS to look for
+	  such hardware error record, and take appropriate action.
+
 config ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
 	bool "APEI memory error recovering support"
 	depends on ACPI_APEI && MEMORY_FAILURE
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 1efefe9..33f77ae 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -827,6 +827,46 @@ static inline void ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes) { }
 static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI
+static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sei);
+
+/*
+ * Return 0 only if one of the SEI error sources successfully reported an error
+ * record sent from the firmware.
+ */
+int ghes_notify_sei(void)
+{
+	struct ghes *ghes;
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sei, list) {
+		if (!ghes_proc(ghes))
+			ret = 0;
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void ghes_sei_add(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sei);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+}
+
+static void ghes_sei_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	list_del_rcu(&ghes->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI */
+static inline void ghes_sei_add(struct ghes *ghes) { }
+static inline void ghes_sei_remove(struct ghes *ghes) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
 /*
  * printk is not safe in NMI context.  So in NMI handler, we allocate
@@ -1055,6 +1095,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 			goto err;
 		}
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
+		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI)) {
+			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEI is not supported!\n",
+				generic->header.source_id);
+		goto err;
+	}
+	break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) {
 			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n",
@@ -1126,6 +1173,9 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
 		ghes_sea_add(ghes);
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
+		ghes_sei_add(ghes);
+		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		ghes_nmi_add(ghes);
 		break;
@@ -1179,6 +1229,9 @@ static int ghes_remove(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
 		ghes_sea_remove(ghes);
 		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
+		ghes_sei_remove(ghes);
+		break;
 	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
 		ghes_nmi_remove(ghes);
 		break;
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 8feb0c8..9ba59e2 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -120,5 +120,6 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_get_next(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata)
 	     section = acpi_hest_get_next(section))
 
 int ghes_notify_sea(void);
+int ghes_notify_sei(void);
 
 #endif /* GHES_H */
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH v10 5/5] arm64: handle NOTIFY_SEI notification by the APEI driver

[Dongjiu Geng]

Add a helper to handle the NOTIFY_SEI notification, when kernel
gets the NOTIFY_SEI notification, call this helper and let APEI
driver to handle this notification.

Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c            |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/mm/fault.c                | 10 ++++++++++
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
index 07aa8e3..9ee13ad 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
 })
 
 int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr);
+int handle_guest_sei(void);
 
 #endif	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index e88096a..6cb280f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -681,6 +681,10 @@ bool arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
 {
 	u32 aet = arm64_ras_serror_get_severity(esr);
 
+	/* The APEI driver may handle this RAS error. */
+	if (!handle_guest_sei())
+		return false;
+
 	switch (aet) {
 	case ESR_ELx_AET_CE:	/* corrected error */
 	case ESR_ELx_AET_UEO:	/* restartable, not yet consumed */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index f76bb2c..8f29bd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -683,6 +683,16 @@ int handle_guest_sea(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned int esr)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+int handle_guest_sei(void)
+{
+	int ret = -ENOENT;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEI))
+		ret = ghes_notify_sei();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 					 struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: KVM: Prepare set virtual SEI syndrome value

[gengdongjiu]

Hi James,

> 
> Hi Dongjiu Geng,
> 
> On 03/03/18 16:09, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> > Export one API to specify virtual SEI syndrome value for guest, and
> > add a helper to get the VSESR_EL2 value.
> 
> This patch adds two helpers that nothing calls... its not big, please merge it with the patch that uses these.

OK, thanks, I will merge them.

> 
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > index 413dc82..3294885 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> > @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long hcr)
> >  	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 = hcr;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline unsigned long vcpu_get_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {
> > +	return vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline void vcpu_set_vsesr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 vsesr)
> > {
> >  	vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2 = vsesr;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index a73f63a..3dc49b7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ void handle_exit_early(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > struct kvm_run *run,  int kvm_perf_init(void);  int
> > kvm_perf_teardown(void);
> >
> > +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome);
> > +
> >  struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long
> > mpidr);
> >
> >  static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t pgd_ptr, diff
> > --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > index 60666a0..78ecb28 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > @@ -186,3 +186,8 @@ void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)  {
> >  	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, ESR_ELx_ISV);  }
> > +
> > +void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 syndrome) {
> > +	pend_guest_serror(vcpu, syndrome & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
> 
> If you move the ISS_MASK into pend_guest_serror(), you wouldn't need this at all.
> 
> It would be better if any validation were in the user-space helpers so we can check user-space hasn't put something funny in the top bits.

Yes, I agree your idea, thanks for the good suggestion.

> 
> > +}
> >
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James