From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755808AbeDZKfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:35:45 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51078 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755108AbeDZKeK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:34:10 -0400 From: Will Deacon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, longman@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 07/14] locking/qspinlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:34:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1524738868-31318-8-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1524738868-31318-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1524738868-31318-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rather than dig into the counter field of the atomic_t inside the qspinlock structure so that we can call smp_cond_load_acquire, use atomic_cond_read_acquire instead, which operates on the atomic_t directly. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c index e42f50d69ed6..5e383cfe4cce 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c @@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) * barriers. */ if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) { - smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter, - !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)); + atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, + !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)); } /* @@ -441,8 +441,8 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) * * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the - * smp_cond_load_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't been - * designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become + * atomic_cond_read_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't + * been designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe. * @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node))) goto locked; - val = smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)); + val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)); locked: /* @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) /* In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set */ if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) { /* - * The smp_cond_load_acquire() call above has provided the + * The atomic_cond_read_acquire() call above has provided the * necessary acquire semantics required for locking. */ old = atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL); -- 2.1.4