LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, <hongkun.cao@mediatek.com>,
	<youlin.pei@mediatek.com>, <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	<yt.shen@mediatek.com>, <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<xinping.qian@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mediatek: Using chained IRQ to setup IRQ handle
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 17:41:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525254064.22948.11.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2f7e70a-fdef-d925-8838-be3051c2e96d@arm.com>

On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 12:03 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Zhang,
> 
> On 20/04/18 06:25, honghui.zhang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Using irq_chip solution to setup IRQs for the consistent with IRQ framework.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c | 192 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > index c3dc549..1d9c6f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >  #include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/msi.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > @@ -130,14 +132,12 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port;
> >  /**
> >   * struct mtk_pcie_soc - differentiate between host generations
> >   * @need_fix_class_id: whether this host's class ID needed to be fixed or not
> > - * @has_msi: whether this host supports MSI interrupts or not
> >   * @ops: pointer to configuration access functions
> >   * @startup: pointer to controller setting functions
> >   * @setup_irq: pointer to initialize IRQ functions
> >   */
> >  struct mtk_pcie_soc {
> >  	bool need_fix_class_id;
> > -	bool has_msi;
> >  	struct pci_ops *ops;
> >  	int (*startup)(struct mtk_pcie_port *port);
> >  	int (*setup_irq)(struct mtk_pcie_port *port, struct device_node *node);
> > @@ -161,7 +161,9 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc {
> >   * @lane: lane count
> >   * @slot: port slot
> >   * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain
> > + * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain
> >   * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain
> > + * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap
> >   * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ
> >   */
> >  struct mtk_pcie_port {
> > @@ -179,7 +181,9 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port {
> >  	u32 lane;
> >  	u32 slot;
> >  	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> > +	struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
> >  	struct irq_domain *msi_domain;
> > +	struct mutex lock;
> >  	DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM);
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -446,103 +450,122 @@ static int mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int mtk_pcie_msi_alloc(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > +static void mtk_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> >  {
> > -	int msi;
> > +	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > +	phys_addr_t addr;
> >  
> > -	msi = find_first_zero_bit(port->msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM);
> > -	if (msi < MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM)
> > -		set_bit(msi, port->msi_irq_in_use);
> > -	else
> > -		return -ENOSPC;
> > +	/* MT2712/MT7622 only support 32-bit MSI addresses */
> > +	addr = virt_to_phys(port->base + PCIE_MSI_VECTOR);
> > +	msg->address_hi = 0;
> > +	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(addr);
> >  
> > -	return msi;
> > +	msg->data = data->hwirq;
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(port->pcie->dev, "msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n",
> > +		(int)data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void mtk_pcie_msi_free(struct mtk_pcie_port *port, unsigned long hwirq)
> > +static int mtk_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
> > +				   const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
> >  {
> > -	clear_bit(hwirq, port->msi_irq_in_use);
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int mtk_pcie_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
> > -				  struct pci_dev *pdev, struct msi_desc *desc)
> > -{
> > -	struct mtk_pcie_port *port;
> > -	struct msi_msg msg;
> > -	unsigned int irq;
> > -	int hwirq;
> > -	phys_addr_t msg_addr;
> > +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
> > +	.name			= "MTK MSI",
> > +	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= mtk_compose_msi_msg,
> > +	.irq_set_affinity	= mtk_msi_set_affinity,
> > +	.irq_mask		= pci_msi_mask_irq,
> > +	.irq_unmask	= pci_msi_unmask_irq,
> > +};
> >  
> > -	port = mtk_pcie_find_port(pdev->bus, pdev->devfn);
> > -	if (!port)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +static int mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> > +				     unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
> > +{
> > +	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data;
> > +	unsigned long bit;
> >  
> > -	hwirq = mtk_pcie_msi_alloc(port);
> > -	if (hwirq < 0)
> > -		return hwirq;
> > +	WARN_ON(nr_irqs != 1);
> > +	mutex_lock(&port->lock);
> >  
> > -	irq = irq_create_mapping(port->msi_domain, hwirq);
> > -	if (!irq) {
> > -		mtk_pcie_msi_free(port, hwirq);
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > +	bit = find_first_zero_bit(port->msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM);
> > +	if (bit >= MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) {
> > +		mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
> > +		return -ENOSPC;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	chip->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > -
> > -	irq_set_msi_desc(irq, desc);
> > +	__set_bit(bit, port->msi_irq_in_use);
> >  
> > -	/* MT2712/MT7622 only support 32-bit MSI addresses */
> > -	msg_addr = virt_to_phys(port->base + PCIE_MSI_VECTOR);
> > -	msg.address_hi = 0;
> > -	msg.address_lo = lower_32_bits(msg_addr);
> > -	msg.data = hwirq;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
> >  
> > -	pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> > +	irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
> > +			    domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
> 
> Why don't you handle the interrupt as an edge interrupt
> (handle_edge_irq)? That's what it really is, and the fact that you use
> "handle_simple_irq" makes me think that wou're papering over some other
> issue (see below).

Hi, Marc,

Thanks very much for your comments.

I guess the MSI irq is more like a level IRQ instead of edge IRQ.
When a MSI IRQ arrived, the corresponding bit of MSI status register
will be asserted and stay asserted until it's been cleared by software.

I will try to using handle_level_irq and add some callbacks of irq_ack
in the next version.

thanks.

> 
> > +			    NULL, NULL);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void mtk_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
> > +static void mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> > +				     unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
> >  {
> > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(chip->dev);
> > -	struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> > -	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > -	struct mtk_pcie_port *port;
> > +	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> > +	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> >  
> > -	port = mtk_pcie_find_port(pdev->bus, pdev->devfn);
> > -	if (!port)
> > -		return;
> > +	mutex_lock(&port->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, port->msi_irq_in_use))
> > +		dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "trying to free unused MSI#%lu\n",
> > +			d->hwirq);
> > +	else
> > +		__clear_bit(d->hwirq, port->msi_irq_in_use);
> >  
> > -	irq_dispose_mapping(irq);
> > -	mtk_pcie_msi_free(port, hwirq);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&port->lock);
> > +
> > +	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static struct msi_controller mtk_pcie_msi_chip = {
> > -	.setup_irq = mtk_pcie_msi_setup_irq,
> > -	.teardown_irq = mtk_msi_teardown_irq,
> > +static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> > +	.alloc	= mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc,
> > +	.free	= mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
> >  	.name = "MTK PCIe MSI",
> > -	.irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
> > -	.irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
> >  	.irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
> >  	.irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int mtk_pcie_msi_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq,
> > -			    irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > +static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = {
> > +	.flags	= (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> > +		   MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX),
> > +	.chip	= &mtk_msi_irq_chip,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_allocate_msi_domains(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> >  {
> > -	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &mtk_msi_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> > -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> > +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(port->pcie->dev->of_node);
> > +
> > +	mutex_init(&port->lock);
> > +
> > +	port->inner_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM,
> > +						      &msi_domain_ops, port);
> > +	if (!port->inner_domain) {
> > +		dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	port->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &mtk_msi_domain_info,
> > +						     port->inner_domain);
> > +	if (!port->msi_domain) {
> > +		dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
> > +		irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain);
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> > -	.map = mtk_pcie_msi_map,
> > -};
> > -
> >  static void mtk_pcie_enable_msi(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> >  {
> >  	u32 val;
> > @@ -575,6 +598,7 @@ static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = port->pcie->dev;
> >  	struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	/* Setup INTx */
> >  	pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
> > @@ -591,27 +615,28 @@ static int mtk_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > -		port->msi_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM,
> > -							 &msi_domain_ops,
> > -							 &mtk_pcie_msi_chip);
> > -		if (!port->msi_domain) {
> > -			dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI IRQ domain\n");
> > -			return -ENODEV;
> > -		}
> > +		ret = mtk_pcie_allocate_msi_domains(port);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +
> >  		mtk_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > +static void mtk_pcie_intr_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> >  {
> > -	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = (struct mtk_pcie_port *)data;
> > +	struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > +	struct irq_chip *irqchip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> >  	unsigned long status;
> >  	u32 virq;
> >  	u32 bit = INTX_SHIFT;
> >  
> > -	while ((status = readl(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS)) & INTX_MASK) {
> > +	chained_irq_enter(irqchip, desc);
> > +
> > +	status = readl(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
> > +	if (status & INTX_MASK) {
> >  		for_each_set_bit_from(bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX + INTX_SHIFT) {
> >  			/* Clear the INTx */
> >  			writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
> > @@ -622,14 +647,14 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> > -		while ((status = readl(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS)) & MSI_STATUS) {
> > +		if (status & MSI_STATUS) {
> >  			unsigned long imsi_status;
> >  
> >  			while ((imsi_status = readl(port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS))) {
> >  				for_each_set_bit(bit, &imsi_status, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) {
> >  					/* Clear the MSI */
> >  					writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
> 
> This write suspiciously looks like an "ack" operation on the controller.
> Why isn't it part of the irqchip as a first class method?
> 
> > -					virq = irq_find_mapping(port->msi_domain, bit);
> > +					virq = irq_find_mapping(port->inner_domain, bit);
> >  					generic_handle_irq(virq);
> >  				}
> >  			}
> > @@ -638,7 +663,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	chained_irq_exit(irqchip, desc);
> > +
> > +	return;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int mtk_pcie_setup_irq(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> > @@ -649,20 +676,15 @@ static int mtk_pcie_setup_irq(struct mtk_pcie_port *port,
> >  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> >  	int err, irq;
> >  
> > -	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, port->slot);
> > -	err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mtk_pcie_intr_handler,
> > -			       IRQF_SHARED, "mtk-pcie", port);
> > -	if (err) {
> > -		dev_err(dev, "unable to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
> > -		return err;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	err = mtk_pcie_init_irq_domain(port, node);
> >  	if (err) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to init PCIe IRQ domain\n");
> >  		return err;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, port->slot);
> > +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, mtk_pcie_intr_handler, port);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1096,8 +1118,6 @@ static int mtk_pcie_register_host(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> >  	host->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
> >  	host->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle;
> >  	host->sysdata = pcie;
> > -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) && pcie->soc->has_msi)
> > -		host->msi = &mtk_pcie_msi_chip;
> >  
> >  	err = pci_scan_root_bus_bridge(host);
> >  	if (err < 0)
> > @@ -1159,7 +1179,6 @@ static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_v1 = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt2712 = {
> > -	.has_msi = true,
> >  	.ops = &mtk_pcie_ops_v2,
> >  	.startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2,
> >  	.setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> > @@ -1167,7 +1186,6 @@ static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt2712 = {
> >  
> >  static const struct mtk_pcie_soc mtk_pcie_soc_mt7622 = {
> >  	.need_fix_class_id = true,
> > -	.has_msi = true,
> >  	.ops = &mtk_pcie_ops_v2,
> >  	.startup = mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2,
> >  	.setup_irq = mtk_pcie_setup_irq,
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-02 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-20  5:25 [PATCH v6 0/2] PCI: mediatek: Fixups for the IRQ handle routine and MT7622's class code honghui.zhang
2018-04-20  5:25 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: mediatek: Set up vendor ID and class type for MT7622 honghui.zhang
2018-04-20  5:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mediatek: Using chained IRQ to setup IRQ handle honghui.zhang
2018-04-30 11:03   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-02  9:41     ` Honghui Zhang [this message]
2018-05-02 10:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-03  9:41         ` Honghui Zhang
2018-05-03 13:05           ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-04  3:25             ` Honghui Zhang
2018-04-30  2:02 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] PCI: mediatek: Fixups for the IRQ handle routine and MT7622's class code Ryder Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1525254064.22948.11.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=honghui.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=hongkun.cao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=xinping.qian@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yt.shen@mediatek.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: mediatek: Using chained IRQ to setup IRQ handle' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).