LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tick: prefer a lower rating device only if it's CPU local device
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 17:02:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1525881728-4858-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
Checking the equality of cpumask for both new and old tick device doesn't
ensure that it's CPU local device. This will cause issue if a low rating
clockevent tick device is registered first followed by the registration
of higher rating clockevent tick device.
In such case, clockevents_released list will never get emptied as both
the devices get selected as preferred one and we will loop forever in
clockevents_notify_released.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-common.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Thomas,
I am seeing this issue on my Juno devboard, where system wide timers
with rating 300 and 400 are registered in same order and we get stuck in
a loop in clockevents_notify_released. Let me know if this looks sane or
you have any suggestions that I can try out.
Regards,
Sudeep
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 49edc1c4f3e6..78e598334007 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
*/
return !curdev ||
newdev->rating > curdev->rating ||
- !cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask);
+ (!cpumask_equal(curdev->cpumask, newdev->cpumask) &&
+ !tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()));
}
/*
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-09 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-09 16:02 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2018-05-13 13:09 ` [tip:timers/core] tick: Prefer " tip-bot for Sudeep Holla
2018-07-02 23:44 ` [PATCH] tick: prefer " Kevin Hilman
2018-07-03 10:53 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-07-03 15:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2018-07-03 15:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-07-03 16:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-03 16:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-07-08 20:59 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-09 15:12 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1525881728-4858-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] tick: prefer a lower rating device only if it'\''s CPU local device' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).