From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpR7rjn4E+ZI/2LOmuB7zVB7+hV2+f9F8JEQ9Ub22o4jGqUDfZSOmMoD4i0l+BWHOfZunfP ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1526052676; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QCVusjsTdDcGj8cGgH0AcS+G1S/K0WKkGpOJVHeSo3Qr/man6djzwS4czp/Qtr3f5U EZl8o6MkeoMgxmac9ESq9VnxxDszzvSfHsCCT6LmnBD1ecPTkfxux0rZfBEYYx2ktGOz FWhxTVNHB/xE0PIbT1cdAlEhtx3LvyqHLsNGCg8ve0VeczbLJTJdNMKlpbkohkPLegG9 PbsA6KohPhLLlaOrABTiOeng/T7cq6XOXB7jkMQeHurHLjdpNjXVBaiXGHRk/QqJkSsa opEO5C/RRRSAsrDh05qnEz144xKHSZVAu6yP7rv+3wIiNdulQU3tCfyiDU5B7Sv7TfUw Hf+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:organization:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :arc-authentication-results; bh=+Q3NpR3P+12E3sBnvkWp8xibaE4Ftr+uoUIH3LX45I4=; b=hPBe8H03o68UD9NgiYZifeS9/CzM4UwWw9Ml12j0HFdFKrHBz/jkDZuz6b0NNpcXgR IsBcw4rBSAFHFSudVqVIA4GtJzSVreyn655Ek3GCm9xm1h89NWdogRzVqZ/hxIj7A4kj YgZctg6bbxKX7/LAsfs0fN/bjeeNyaA6itEVbBwrKuINQZFraelYmAT1ap6oRxtyJqG5 ICYR9EMRoIGqDxWQFN+u8Gu+IhUOvEsmxbdXp6dhNjBSepvsOtSHJr/PbEtNeJi1iRTS OIUmPEwzXRTv+8E/o7nk8avxk4ZDWdnIdl6JrGJoZEVEAoZXzoahMPe3BZh1btMk7j6O NtRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of alan@linux.intel.com designates 134.134.136.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alan@linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of alan@linux.intel.com designates 134.134.136.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=alan@linux.intel.com X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,389,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="41035283" Message-ID: <1526052671.26291.58.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media: staging: atomisp: Fix an error handling path in 'lm3554_probe()' From: Alan Cox To: Julia Lawall , Christophe JAILLET Cc: sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, chen.chenchacha@foxmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 16:31:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.24.6 (3.24.6-1.fc26) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1600180660963930909?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1600182211329589465?= X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:09 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Fri, 11 May 2018, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > The use of 'fail1' and 'fail2' is not correct. Reorder these calls > > to > > branch at the right place of the error handling path. > > Maybe it would be good to improve the names at the same time? Its scheduled for deletion - please don't bother. Alan