LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] x86/split_lock: Trace #AC exception for split lock
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:52:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1526323945-211107-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526323945-211107-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

Create two events x86_exceptions.split_lock_user to trace #AC
exception for split lock triggered from user space and
x86_exceptions.split_lock_kernel to trace #AC exception for split
lock from triggered from kernel space.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/trace/common.h     |  8 ++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h | 21 ++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c        | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/common.h
index 57c8da027d99..5e61c7348349 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/common.h
@@ -8,9 +8,17 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(trace_pagefault_key);
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(trace_resched_ipi_key);
 #define trace_resched_ipi_enabled()			\
 	static_branch_unlikely(&trace_resched_ipi_key)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(trace_split_lock_key);
+#define trace_split_lock_enabled()			\
+	static_branch_unlikely(&trace_split_lock_key)
+#endif
+
 #else
 static inline bool trace_pagefault_enabled(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool trace_resched_ipi_enabled(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool trace_split_lock_enabled(void) { return false; }
 #endif
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h
index 69615e387973..2a4ea0c70963 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trace/exceptions.h
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 #undef TRACE_SYSTEM
 #define TRACE_SYSTEM exceptions
 
-#if !defined(_TRACE_PAGE_FAULT_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
-#define _TRACE_PAGE_FAULT_H
+#if !defined(_TRACE_EXCEPTIONS_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define _TRACE_EXCEPTIONS_H
 
 #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
 #include <asm/trace/common.h>
@@ -44,10 +44,25 @@ DEFINE_EVENT_FN(x86_exceptions, name,				\
 DEFINE_PAGE_FAULT_EVENT(page_fault_user);
 DEFINE_PAGE_FAULT_EVENT(page_fault_kernel);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPLIT_LOCK_AC
+int trace_split_lock_reg(void);
+void trace_split_lock_unreg(void);
+
+#define DEFINE_SPLIT_LOCK_FAULT_EVENT(name)			\
+DEFINE_EVENT_FN(x86_exceptions, name,				\
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned long address,	struct pt_regs *regs,	\
+		 unsigned long error_code),			\
+	TP_ARGS(address, regs, error_code),			\
+	trace_split_lock_reg, trace_split_lock_unreg)
+
+DEFINE_SPLIT_LOCK_FAULT_EVENT(split_lock_user);
+DEFINE_SPLIT_LOCK_FAULT_EVENT(split_lock_kernel);
+#endif
+
 #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
 #define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
 #define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE exceptions
-#endif /*  _TRACE_PAGE_FAULT_H */
+#endif /*  _TRACE_EXCEPTIONS_H */
 
 /* This part must be outside protection */
 #include <trace/define_trace.h>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
index 020af331594d..948a7fa948a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/split_lock.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
+#include <asm-generic/kprobes.h>
+#include <asm/trace/exceptions.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 
 static bool split_lock_ac_supported;
@@ -45,6 +47,8 @@ static const char * const user_modes[USER_MODE_LAST] = {
 	[USER_MODE_RE_EXECUTE] = "re-execute",
 };
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(trace_split_lock_key);
+
 /*
  * On processors not supporting #AC exception for split lock feature,
  * MSR_TEST_CTL may not exist or MSR_TEST_CTL exists but the bit 29 is
@@ -116,6 +120,20 @@ static __init int setup_split_lock_ac(char *str)
 }
 __setup("split_lock_ac=", setup_split_lock_ac);
 
+int trace_split_lock_reg(void)
+{
+	if (split_lock_ac_supported)
+		static_branch_inc(&trace_split_lock_key);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void trace_split_lock_unreg(void)
+{
+	if (split_lock_ac_supported)
+		static_branch_dec(&trace_split_lock_key);
+}
+
 static bool _setup_split_lock(int split_lock_ac_val)
 {
 	u32 l, h;
@@ -268,6 +286,31 @@ static bool re_execute(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static nokprobe_inline void
+trace_split_lock_entries(unsigned long address, struct pt_regs *regs,
+			 unsigned long error_code)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If either CR0.AM or EFLAGS.AC is zero in user, the #AC must
+	 * come from split lock. Trace the #AC in split_lock_user event.
+	 *
+	 * For other cases, the #AC could be from split lock or from
+	 * generic cache line misalignment. Don't trace the #AC. In
+	 * theory, that means some split lock events may not be traced.
+	 * But usually EFLAGS.AC is not set for user process; so this
+	 * is not big issue.
+	 */
+	if (user_mode(regs) && (cr0_am(regs) == 0 || eflags_ac(regs) == 0))
+		trace_split_lock_user(address, regs, error_code);
+
+	/*
+	 * Only split lock can trigger #AC from kernel. Trace the #AC in
+	 * split_lock_kernel event.
+	 */
+	if (!user_mode(regs))
+		trace_split_lock_kernel(address, regs, error_code);
+}
+
 /*
  * #AC handler for kernel split lock is called by generic #AC handler.
  *
@@ -280,6 +323,9 @@ bool do_split_lock_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
 	unsigned long address = read_cr2(); /* Get the faulting address */
 	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
+	if (trace_split_lock_enabled())
+		trace_split_lock_entries(address, regs, error_code);
+
 	if (!re_execute(regs))
 		return false;
 
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14 18:52 [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:36   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 15:41     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:54       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:51   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:35     ` Luck, Tony
2018-05-15 17:21     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:44       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-16 21:35         ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions to clear cpufeature Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in BIOS in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 21:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/split_lock: Explicitly enable or disable #AC for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 16:15   ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 17:29     ` Fenghua Yu
2018-05-16 16:37       ` Dave Hansen
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock during run time Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to show and control BIOS split lock setting Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and testing sysfs interface Fenghua Yu
2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86/split_lock: Add split lock user space test in selftest Fenghua Yu
2018-05-15 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen
2018-05-15 16:26   ` Alan Cox
2018-05-15 16:30     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1526323945-211107-14-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 13/15] x86/split_lock: Trace #AC exception for split lock' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).