LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Rafael Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>, "Alan Cox" <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: "x86" <x86@kernel.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH 05/15] x86/split_lock: Use non atomic set and clear bit instructions to clear cpufeature Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:52:15 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1526323945-211107-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1526323945-211107-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com> When #AC exception is enabled for split locked accesses, clear_cpufeature() generates #AC exception because of atomic setting or clearing bits in non cache line aligned x86_capability depending on compiler. But kernel clears cpufeatures only when a CPU boots up. Therefore, there is no racing condition when clear_cpufeature() is called and no need to atomically clear or set x86_capability. To avoid #AC exception caused by split lock and get better performance, call non atomic __set_bit() and __clear_bit(). Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c index 2c0bd38a44ab..0c02c6e44ea7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c @@ -65,15 +65,15 @@ static const struct cpuid_dep cpuid_deps[] = { static inline void clear_feature(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int feature) { /* - * Note: This could use the non atomic __*_bit() variants, but the - * rest of the cpufeature code uses atomics as well, so keep it for - * consistency. Cleanup all of it separately. + * Because this code is only called during boot time and there + * is no need to be atomic, use non atomic __*_bit() to avoid + * #AC exception for split locked access. */ if (!c) { clear_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, feature); - set_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared); + __set_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared); } else { - clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability); + __clear_bit(feature, (unsigned long *)c->x86_capability); } } -- 2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-14 18:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-14 18:52 [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and enumerate #AC exception for split locked access feature Fenghua Yu 2018-05-15 15:36 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-15 15:41 ` Fenghua Yu 2018-05-15 15:54 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86/split_lock: Set up #AC exception for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86/split_lock: Handle #AC exception for split lock in kernel mode Fenghua Yu 2018-05-15 15:51 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-15 16:35 ` Luck, Tony 2018-05-15 17:21 ` Fenghua Yu 2018-05-16 16:44 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-16 21:35 ` Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86/split_lock: Use non locked bit set instruction in set_cpu_cap Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` Fenghua Yu [this message] 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86/split_lock: Save #AC setting for split lock in BIOS in boot time and restore the setting in reboot Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/split_lock: Handle suspend/hibernate and resume Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/split_lock: Set split lock during EFI runtime service Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/split_lock: Explicitly enable or disable #AC for split locked accesses Fenghua Yu 2018-05-15 16:15 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-15 17:29 ` Fenghua Yu 2018-05-16 16:37 ` Dave Hansen 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/split_lock: Add a sysfs interface to allow user to enable or disable split lock during run time Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to control user mode behavior Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86/split_lock: Add sysfs interface to show and control BIOS split lock setting Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86/split_lock: Trace #AC exception for split lock Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/split_lock: Add CONFIG and testing sysfs interface Fenghua Yu 2018-05-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86/split_lock: Add split lock user space test in selftest Fenghua Yu 2018-05-15 15:10 ` [PATCH 0/15] x86/split_lock: Enable #AC exception for split locked accesses Dave Hansen 2018-05-15 16:26 ` Alan Cox 2018-05-15 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1526323945-211107-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \ --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=arjan@infradead.org \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@elte.hu \ --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \ --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).