From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752730AbeEOVO1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2018 17:14:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33484 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbeEOVOZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2018 17:14:25 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Agrawal, Akshu" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" From: Stephen Boyd In-Reply-To: <9f31fc22-b97f-0241-30cd-798ee03b2f1d@amd.com> Cc: djkurtz@chromium.org, Alexander.Deucher@amd.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, airlied@redhat.com, Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <1525859941-23654-1-git-send-email-akshu.agrawal@amd.com> <1525859941-23654-2-git-send-email-akshu.agrawal@amd.com> <20362702.FCbsg9xPKv@aspire.rjw.lan> <9f31fc22-b97f-0241-30cd-798ee03b2f1d@amd.com> Message-ID: <152641886428.237094.9491189918943948420@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.7 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 14:14:24 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id w4FLEW1f025324 Quoting Agrawal, Akshu (2018-05-15 02:39:08) > > > On 5/15/2018 3:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:59:00 AM CEST Akshu Agrawal wrote: > >> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and > >> 48Mhz of frequency. > >> The clock is available for general system use. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal > > > > I'm not sure if the Stephen Boyd's comments on one of the previous > > versions of this patch have been addressed. Have they? > > > > In any case, if I'm expected to take this, I need an ACK from Stephen on it. > > > > Thanks, > > Rafael > > > > All comments of Stephen Boyd and Daniel Kurtz have been addressed. > > Stephen, if you are Ok with this can you please ACK it. > It could go via clk tree and meet up with the acpi patch in -next right? I'm fine with it going through acpi path though so whichever way works.