LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@ziemianowicz.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] clk: at91: PLL recalc_rate() now using cached MUL and DIV values
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 16:04:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152642549058.237094.805373991669238611@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509043205.GA57916@hak8or>

Quoting Marcin Ziemianowicz (2018-05-08 21:32:05)
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:01:11 -0400
> > Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@ziemianowicz.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > When a USB device is connected to the USB host port on the SAM9N12 then
> > > you get "-62" error which seems to indicate USB replies from the device
> > > are timing out. Based on a logic sniffer, I saw the USB bus was running
> > > at half speed.
> > > 
> > > The PLL code uses cached MUL and DIV values which get set in set_rate()
> > > and applied in prepare(), but the recalc_rate() function instead
> > > queries the hardware instead of using these cached values. Therefore,
> > > if recalc_rate() is called between a set_rate() and prepare(), the
> > > wrong frequency is calculated and later the USB clock divider for the
> > > SAM9N12 SOC will be configured for an incorrect clock.
> > > 
> > > In my case, the PLL hardware was set to 96 Mhz before the OHCI
> > > driver loads, and therefore the usb clock divider was being set
> > > to /2 even though the OHCI driver set the PLL to 48 Mhz.
> > > 
> > > As an alternative explanation, I noticed this was fixed in the past by
> > > 87e2ed338f1b ("clk: at91: fix recalc_rate implementation of PLL
> > > driver") but the bug was later re-introduced by 1bdf02326b71 ("clk:
> > > at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally").
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 1bdf02326b71 ("clk: at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally)
> > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@ziemianowicz.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
> 
> Apologies for being a bother, but since it's been a bit over a week,
> should I do something with this now that it has been ACK'd? I was thinking
> I would see it somewhere on the git group repo but am not seeing it there
> yet. Googling says that there is a "review cycle" for some maintainers, but
> I am not clear on if I need to initiate it manually or anything of the sort.
> 

I'll apply it to clk-next. Should appear in linux-next in day or so.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-15 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-29 19:01 Marcin Ziemianowicz
2018-04-30  5:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-05-09  4:32   ` Marcin Ziemianowicz
2018-05-15 23:04     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2018-05-16  6:39 ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152642549058.237094.805373991669238611@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcin@ziemianowicz.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH V4] clk: at91: PLL recalc_rate() now using cached MUL and DIV values' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).