LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes: Ignore break_handler
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 08:58:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152651511510.25583.17622383189254834099.stgit@devbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152651499561.25583.14488389770693278906.stgit@devbox>

Ignore break_handler related code because it was only
used by jprobe and jprobe is removed.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/kprobes.txt |    2 +-
 kernel/kprobes.c          |   39 +++++----------------------------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
index 5ae80baf3921..907a3017c0f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ is optimized, that modification is ignored.  Thus, if you want to
 tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization,
 using one of the following techniques:
 
-- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler or break_handler.
+- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler.
 
 or
 
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 69de130595f7..536ab451e96d 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -627,8 +627,8 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	    (kprobe_disabled(p) || kprobes_all_disarmed))
 		return;
 
-	/* Both of break_handler and post_handler are not supported. */
-	if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+	/* kprobes with post_handler can not be optimized */
+	if (p->post_handler)
 		return;
 
 	op = container_of(p, struct optimized_kprobe, kp);
@@ -1116,20 +1116,6 @@ static int aggr_fault_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_fault_handler);
 
-static int aggr_break_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	struct kprobe *cur = __this_cpu_read(kprobe_instance);
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (cur && cur->break_handler) {
-		if (cur->break_handler(cur, regs))
-			ret = 1;
-	}
-	reset_kprobe_instance();
-	return ret;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(aggr_break_handler);
-
 /* Walks the list and increments nmissed count for multiprobe case */
 void kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(struct kprobe *p)
 {
@@ -1270,24 +1256,15 @@ static void cleanup_rp_inst(struct kretprobe *rp)
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(cleanup_rp_inst);
 
-/*
-* Add the new probe to ap->list. Fail if this is the
-* second break_handler at the address
-*/
+/* Add the new probe to ap->list */
 static int add_new_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	BUG_ON(kprobe_gone(ap) || kprobe_gone(p));
 
-	if (p->break_handler || p->post_handler)
+	if (p->post_handler)
 		unoptimize_kprobe(ap, true);	/* Fall back to normal kprobe */
 
-	if (p->break_handler) {
-		if (ap->break_handler)
-			return -EEXIST;
-		list_add_tail_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
-		ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
-	} else
-		list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
+	list_add_rcu(&p->list, &ap->list);
 	if (p->post_handler && !ap->post_handler)
 		ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
 
@@ -1310,8 +1287,6 @@ static void init_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap, struct kprobe *p)
 	/* We don't care the kprobe which has gone. */
 	if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
 		ap->post_handler = aggr_post_handler;
-	if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
-		ap->break_handler = aggr_break_handler;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ap->list);
 	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ap->hlist);
@@ -1706,8 +1681,6 @@ static int __unregister_kprobe_top(struct kprobe *p)
 		goto disarmed;
 	else {
 		/* If disabling probe has special handlers, update aggrprobe */
-		if (p->break_handler && !kprobe_gone(p))
-			ap->break_handler = NULL;
 		if (p->post_handler && !kprobe_gone(p)) {
 			list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &ap->list, list) {
 				if ((list_p != p) && (list_p->post_handler))
@@ -1911,7 +1884,6 @@ int register_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
 	rp->kp.pre_handler = pre_handler_kretprobe;
 	rp->kp.post_handler = NULL;
 	rp->kp.fault_handler = NULL;
-	rp->kp.break_handler = NULL;
 
 	/* Pre-allocate memory for max kretprobe instances */
 	if (rp->maxactive <= 0) {
@@ -2034,7 +2006,6 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(kp, &p->list, list)
 			kp->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
 		p->post_handler = NULL;
-		p->break_handler = NULL;
 		kill_optimized_kprobe(p);
 	}
 	/*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-16 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-16 23:56 [PATCH -tip v3 0/7] kprobes: x86: Cleanup jprobe implementation on x86 Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:57 ` [PATCH -tip v3 1/7] Documentation/kprobes: Fix to remove remaining jprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:57 ` [PATCH -tip v3 2/7] kprobes: Remove jprobe API implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:58 ` [PATCH -tip v3 3/7] x86: kprobes: Remove jprobe implementation Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-05-18  6:16   ` [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes: Ignore break_handler Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 13:38     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-18  6:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 14:14     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:59 ` [PATCH -tip v3 5/7] x86: " Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-18  6:26   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 13:42     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-16 23:59 ` [PATCH -tip v3 6/7] bpf: error-inject: x86: Fix unbalanced preempt-count for function override Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-17  0:00 ` [PATCH -tip v3 7/7] x86: kprobes: Do not disable preempt on int3 path Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-18  6:23 ` [PATCH -tip v3 0/7] kprobes: x86: Cleanup jprobe implementation on x86 Ingo Molnar
2018-05-18 14:10   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152651511510.25583.17622383189254834099.stgit@devbox \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH -tip v3 4/7] kprobes: Ignore break_handler' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).