LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] ima: add build time policy
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 07:09:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527160176-29269-7-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527160176-29269-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
IMA by default does not measure, appraise or audit files, but can be
enabled at runtime by specifying a builtin policy on the boot command line
or by loading a custom policy.
This patch defines a build time policy, which verifies kernel modules,
firmware, kexec image, and/or the IMA policy signatures. This build time
policy is automatically enabled at runtime. The build time policy rules
persist after loading a custom policy.
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
index 6a8f67714c83..004919d9bf09 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
@@ -156,6 +156,64 @@ config IMA_APPRAISE
<http://linux-ima.sourceforge.net>
If unsure, say N.
+config IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ bool "IMA build time configured policy rules"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS
+ default n
+ help
+ This option defines an IMA appraisal policy at build time, which
+ is enforced at run time without having to specify a builtin
+ policy name on the boot command line. The build time appraisal
+ policy rules persist after loading a custom policy.
+
+ Depending on the rules configured, this policy may require kernel
+ modules, firmware, the kexec kernel image, and/or the IMA policy
+ to be signed. Unsigned files might prevent the system from
+ booting or applications from working properly.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise firmware signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ This option defines a policy requiring all firmware to be signed,
+ including the regulatory.db. If both this option and
+ CFG80211_REQUIRE_SIGNED_REGDB are enabled, then both signature
+ verification methods are necessary.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise kexec kernel image signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require all kexec'ed kernel images to
+ be signed and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA
+ keyring.
+
+ Kernel image signatures can not be verified by the original
+ kexec_load syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent its
+ usage.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise kernel modules signatures"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require all kernel modules to be signed
+ and verified by a public key on the trusted IMA keyring.
+
+ Kernel module signatures can only be verified by IMA-appraisal,
+ via the finit_module syscall. Enabling this rule will prevent
+ the usage of the init_module syscall.
+
+config IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS
+ bool "Appraise IMA policy signature"
+ depends on IMA_APPRAISE_BUILD_POLICY
+ default n
+ help
+ Enabling this rule will require the IMA policy to be signed and
+ and verified by a key on the trusted IMA keyring.
+
config IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM
bool "ima_appraise boot parameter"
depends on IMA_APPRAISE
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index c27f6993b07a..3c0bc8a1a88e 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
int ima_policy_flag;
static int temp_ima_appraise;
+static int build_ima_appraise __ro_after_init;
#define MAX_LSM_RULES 6
enum lsm_rule_types { LSM_OBJ_USER, LSM_OBJ_ROLE, LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
@@ -162,6 +163,25 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
#endif
};
+static struct ima_rule_entry build_appraise_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_MODULE_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_FIRMWARE_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = FIRMWARE_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_KEXEC_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_REQUIRE_POLICY_SIGS
+ {.action = APPRAISE, .func = POLICY_CHECK,
+ .flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
+#endif
+};
+
static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
{.action = APPRAISE, .func = MODULE_CHECK,
.flags = IMA_FUNC | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
@@ -435,7 +455,7 @@ void ima_update_policy_flag(void)
ima_policy_flag |= entry->action;
}
- ima_appraise |= temp_ima_appraise;
+ ima_appraise |= (build_ima_appraise | temp_ima_appraise);
if (!ima_appraise)
ima_policy_flag &= ~IMA_APPRAISE;
}
@@ -488,8 +508,8 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
}
/*
- * Insert the appraise rules requiring file signatures, prior to
- * any other appraise rules.
+ * Insert the builtin "secure_boot" policy rules requiring file
+ * signatures, prior to any other appraise rules.
*/
for (i = 0; i < secure_boot_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&secure_boot_rules[i].list, &ima_default_rules);
@@ -497,6 +517,26 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
ima_appraise_flag(secure_boot_rules[i].func);
}
+ /*
+ * Insert the build time appraise rules requiring file signatures
+ * for both the initial and custom policies, prior to other appraise
+ * rules.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(build_appraise_rules); i++) {
+ struct ima_rule_entry *entry;
+
+ if (!secure_boot_entries)
+ list_add_tail(&build_appraise_rules[i].list,
+ &ima_default_rules);
+
+ entry = kmemdup(&build_appraise_rules[i], sizeof(*entry),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (entry)
+ list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
+ build_ima_appraise |=
+ ima_appraise_flag(build_appraise_rules[i].func);
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < appraise_entries; i++) {
list_add_tail(&default_appraise_rules[i].list,
&ima_default_rules);
--
2.7.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-24 11:09 [PATCH v3 0/7] kexec/firmware: support system wide policy requiring signatures Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] security: rename security_kernel_read_file() hook Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 20:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-24 23:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-25 12:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-25 15:41 ` James Morris
2018-05-25 19:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-29 20:32 ` James Morris
2018-05-29 21:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] kexec: add call to LSM hook in original kexec_load syscall Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 20:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ima: based on policy require signed kexec kernel images Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] firmware: add call to LSM hook before firmware sysfs fallback Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ima: based on policy require signed firmware (sysfs fallback) Mimi Zohar
2018-05-24 11:09 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2018-05-24 11:09 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/7] ima: based on policy prevent loading firmware (pre-allocated buffer) Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1527160176-29269-7-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andresx7@gmail.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] ima: add build time policy' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).