LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cang@codeaurora.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Fix register underspecification
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 16:53:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154181119838.88331.10401425771645606506@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=UKfDsthT4W3H4jR0Qvw-izLShCjWngN2uBrY-FUEtDDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Doug Anderson (2018-11-05 08:52:39)
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 7:40 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB3_SEC_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> > > + clock-names = "pipe0";
> > > + clock-output-names = "usb3_uni_phy_pipe_clk_src";
> >
> > If this has clock-output-names then I would expect to see a #clock-cells
> > property, but that isn't here in this node. Are we relying on the same
> > property in the parent node?
>
> If I had to guess, I believe it's yet more confusing than that. I
> believe you actually point to the parent phandle if you want to use
> the clock. I notice that the parent has #clock-cells as 1 so
> presumably this is how you point to one child or the other? ...but I
> don't think it's documented how this works.
There are 'clock-ranges', that almost nobody uses. It might be usable
for this purpose.
> The lane nodes don't have
> any sort of ID as far as I can tell. ...and in any case having
> #clock-cells of 1 makes no sense for USB 3 PHYs which are supposed to
> only have one child?
>
> Let's look at the code, maybe? Hrm, phy_pipe_clk_register() takes no
> ID or anything. Huh? OK, so as far as I can tell
> of_clk_add_provider() is never called on this clock...
>
> So I think the answer is that #clock-cells should be <0> and should
> move to the child node to match with clock-output-names. Then I guess
> (if anyone references this clock from the device tree rather than
> relying on the global clock-output-names) we should add the
> of_clk_add_provider() into the code?
>
> Maybe we can add that as a patch to the end of this series? There are
> so many crazy / random things wrong with these bindings that it makes
> sense to make smaller / incremental changes?
>
Sure that sounds fine. It would be another case where a driver would
want to call the proposed devm_of_clk_add_parent_provider() API.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-10 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 17:35 [PATCH v5 0/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add UFS DT nodes Evan Green
2018-10-26 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Fix register underspecification Evan Green
2018-11-04 2:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-11-05 16:52 ` Doug Anderson
2018-11-10 0:53 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2018-10-26 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] phy: qcom-qmp: Utilize fully-specified DT registers Evan Green
2018-10-26 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add UFS controller Evan Green
2018-11-22 7:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-11-28 23:43 ` Evan Green
2018-10-26 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add UFS nodes for sdm845-mtp Evan Green
2018-11-19 19:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-11-19 19:25 ` Doug Anderson
2018-11-19 19:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-11-22 7:04 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-11-28 2:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-26 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add USB PHY lane two Evan Green
2018-11-22 7:07 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154181119838.88331.10401425771645606506@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Fix register underspecification' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).