From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FDEC282CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1009921019 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730446AbfEVVA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 17:00:57 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56378 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729937AbfEVVA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 17:00:57 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4870AD78; Wed, 22 May 2019 21:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1558558075.2470.2.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: host: xhci: allow __GFP_FS in dma allocation From: Oliver Neukum To: Alan Stern Cc: Jaewon Kim , Christoph Hellwig , linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Jaewon Kim , m.szyprowski@samsung.com, ytk.lee@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 22:47:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mi, 2019-05-22 at 10:56 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2019, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > I agree with the problem, but I fail to see why this issue would be > > specific to USB. Shouldn't this be done in the device core layer? > > Only for drivers that are on the block-device writeback path. The > device core doesn't know which drivers these are. Neither does USB know. It is very hard to predict or even tell which devices are block device drivers. I think we must assume that any device may be affected. Regards Oliver