LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
@ 2019-06-04 12:26 Young Xiao
2019-06-05 20:20 ` Lad, Prabhakar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Young Xiao @ 2019-06-04 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: prabhakar.csengg, mchehab, hverkuil, linux-media, linux-kernel; +Cc: Young Xiao
If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
become unreleased.
The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
index b5aacb0..75c2c10 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
@@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
return err;
}
+static inline void free_vpif_objs(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
+ kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
+}
+
static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
@@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
if (err) {
v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
- goto cleanup;
+ goto vpif_free;
}
while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
@@ -1701,7 +1709,9 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"registered sub device %s\n",
subdevdata->name);
}
- vpif_probe_complete();
+ err = vpif_probe_complete();
+ if (err)
+ goto probe_subdev_out;
} else {
vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
@@ -1720,6 +1730,8 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
vpif_unregister:
v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
+vpif_free:
+ free_vpif_objs();
cleanup:
v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-06-04 12:26 [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe() Young Xiao
@ 2019-06-05 20:20 ` Lad, Prabhakar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lad, Prabhakar @ 2019-06-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Young Xiao; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Hans Verkuil, linux-media, LKML
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:25 PM Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
> then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> become unreleased.
>
> The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> index b5aacb0..75c2c10 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> @@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static inline void free_vpif_objs(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> +}
> +
> static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> @@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> if (err) {
> v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
> - goto cleanup;
> + goto vpif_free;
> }
>
> while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
> @@ -1701,7 +1709,9 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "registered sub device %s\n",
> subdevdata->name);
> }
> - vpif_probe_complete();
> + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> + if (err)
> + goto probe_subdev_out;
> } else {
> vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
> err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
> @@ -1720,6 +1730,8 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
> vpif_unregister:
> v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> +vpif_free:
> + free_vpif_objs();
> cleanup:
> v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
@ 2019-06-04 7:50 Young Xiao
2019-06-04 8:15 ` Lad, Prabhakar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Young Xiao @ 2019-06-04 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: prabhakar.csengg, mchehab, linux-media, linux-kernel, hverkuil; +Cc: Young Xiao
If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
become unreleased.
The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
index b5aacb0..277d500 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
@@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
return err;
}
+static void free_vpif_objs(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
+ kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
+}
+
static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
@@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
if (err) {
v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
- goto cleanup;
+ goto vpif_free;
}
while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
@@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"registered sub device %s\n",
subdevdata->name);
}
- vpif_probe_complete();
+ err = vpif_probe_complete();
+ if (err) {
+ goto probe_subdev_out;
+ }
} else {
vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
@@ -1720,6 +1731,8 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
vpif_unregister:
v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
+vpif_free:
+ free_vpif_objs();
cleanup:
v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
@@ -1748,8 +1761,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
/* Unregister video device */
video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
- kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
}
+ free_vpif_objs();
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-06-04 7:50 Young Xiao
@ 2019-06-04 8:15 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2019-06-04 8:33 ` Yang Xiao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lad, Prabhakar @ 2019-06-04 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Young Xiao; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media, LKML, Hans Verkuil
Hi Young,
Thanks for the patch.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:49 AM Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
> then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> become unreleased.
>
> The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> index b5aacb0..277d500 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> @@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static void free_vpif_objs(void)
> +{
function could be made inline.
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES ? this should be VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES
> + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> +}
> +
> static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> @@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> if (err) {
> v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
> - goto cleanup;
> + goto vpif_free;
> }
>
> while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
> @@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "registered sub device %s\n",
> subdevdata->name);
> }
> - vpif_probe_complete();
> + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> + if (err) {
> + goto probe_subdev_out;
> + }
No need for { and } as per kernel coding style.
> } else {
> vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
> err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
> @@ -1720,6 +1731,8 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
> vpif_unregister:
> v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> +vpif_free:
> + free_vpif_objs();
> cleanup:
> v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
>
> @@ -1748,8 +1761,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
> /* Unregister video device */
> video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
> - kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> }
> + free_vpif_objs();
no need for this change, leave it as it is.
Cheers,
Prabhakar Lad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-06-04 8:15 ` Lad, Prabhakar
@ 2019-06-04 8:33 ` Yang Xiao
2019-06-04 8:47 ` Lad, Prabhakar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yang Xiao @ 2019-06-04 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lad, Prabhakar; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media, LKML, Hans Verkuil
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:15 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Young,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:49 AM Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
> > then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> > become unreleased.
> >
> > The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > index b5aacb0..277d500 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > @@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +static void free_vpif_objs(void)
> > +{
> function could be made inline.
>
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
>
> VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES ? this should be VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES
>
> > + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> > struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> > struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> > @@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> > if (err) {
> > v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
> > - goto cleanup;
> > + goto vpif_free;
> > }
> >
> > while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
> > @@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > "registered sub device %s\n",
> > subdevdata->name);
> > }
> > - vpif_probe_complete();
> > + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> > + if (err) {
> > + goto probe_subdev_out;
> > + }
>
> No need for { and } as per kernel coding style.
Sorry, I can not get your point here.
There is no need to check the return value of vpif_probe_complete(), isn't it?
So, we just fix the memory leak in the error path of v4l2_device_register()?
>
> > } else {
> > vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
> > err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
> > @@ -1720,6 +1731,8 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > kfree(vpif_obj.sd);
> > vpif_unregister:
> > v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> > +vpif_free:
> > + free_vpif_objs();
> > cleanup:
> > v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
> >
> > @@ -1748,8 +1761,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> > ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
> > /* Unregister video device */
> > video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
> > - kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> > }
> > + free_vpif_objs();
>
> no need for this change, leave it as it is.
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar Lad
--
Best regards!
Young
-----------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-06-04 8:33 ` Yang Xiao
@ 2019-06-04 8:47 ` Lad, Prabhakar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lad, Prabhakar @ 2019-06-04 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Xiao; +Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, linux-media, LKML, Hans Verkuil
Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:34 AM Yang Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:15 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Young,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:49 AM Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If vpif_probe() fails on v4l2_device_register() and vpif_probe_complete(),
> > > then memory allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> > > become unreleased.
> > >
> > > The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > > index b5aacb0..277d500 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > > @@ -1385,6 +1385,14 @@ static int initialize_vpif(void)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void free_vpif_objs(void)
> > > +{
> > function could be made inline.
> >
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> >
> > VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES ? this should be VPIF_CAPTURE_MAX_DEVICES
> >
> > > + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
> > > struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> > > struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
> > > @@ -1654,7 +1662,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > err = v4l2_device_register(vpif_dev, &vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> > > if (err) {
> > > v4l2_err(vpif_dev->driver, "Error registering v4l2 device\n");
> > > - goto cleanup;
> > > + goto vpif_free;
> > > }
> > >
> > > while ((res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, res_idx))) {
> > > @@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > "registered sub device %s\n",
> > > subdevdata->name);
> > > }
> > > - vpif_probe_complete();
> > > + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> > > + if (err) {
> > > + goto probe_subdev_out;
> > > + }
> >
> > No need for { and } as per kernel coding style.
>
> Sorry, I can not get your point here.
> There is no need to check the return value of vpif_probe_complete(), isn't it?
> So, we just fix the memory leak in the error path of v4l2_device_register()?
>
Not sure if you got my statement here, it means do not add {} braces
around the if statement,
so for example the code should look like something below (refer the
link [1] for more reading)
err = vpif_probe_complete();
if (err)
goto probe_subdev_out;
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces
Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
@ 2019-05-29 13:09 Young Xiao
2019-06-03 11:55 ` Hans Verkuil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Young Xiao @ 2019-05-29 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: prabhakar.csengg, mchehab, linux-media, linux-kernel; +Cc: Young Xiao
If vpif_probe() fails on vpif_probe_complete(), then memory
allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
become unreleased.
The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
index b5aacb0..63e6ec4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
@@ -1621,6 +1621,14 @@ vpif_capture_get_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
return NULL;
}
+static void free_vpif_objs(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
+ kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
+}
+
/**
* vpif_probe : This function probes the vpif capture driver
* @pdev: platform device pointer
@@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"registered sub device %s\n",
subdevdata->name);
}
- vpif_probe_complete();
+ err = vpif_probe_complete();
+ if (err) {
+ goto probe_subdev_out;
+ }
} else {
vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
@@ -1722,6 +1733,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
cleanup:
v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
+ free_vpif_objs();
return err;
}
@@ -1748,8 +1760,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
/* Unregister video device */
video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
- kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
}
+ free_vpif_objs()
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-05-29 13:09 Young Xiao
@ 2019-06-03 11:55 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-06-04 7:15 ` Yang Xiao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Hans Verkuil @ 2019-06-03 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Young Xiao, prabhakar.csengg, mchehab, linux-media, linux-kernel
On 5/29/19 3:09 PM, Young Xiao wrote:
> If vpif_probe() fails on vpif_probe_complete(), then memory
> allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> become unreleased.
>
> The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> index b5aacb0..63e6ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> @@ -1621,6 +1621,14 @@ vpif_capture_get_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void free_vpif_objs(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * vpif_probe : This function probes the vpif capture driver
> * @pdev: platform device pointer
> @@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "registered sub device %s\n",
> subdevdata->name);
> }
> - vpif_probe_complete();
> + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> + if (err) {
> + goto probe_subdev_out;
> + }
No need for { and } as per kernel coding style.
> } else {
> vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
> err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
> @@ -1722,6 +1733,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> cleanup:
> v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
> + free_vpif_objs();
This would break the case where initialize_vpif() returns an error, since
initialize_vpif already frees these objects on error.
In this case the easiest way of doing this is to just return if initialize_vpif
returns an error. No need to clean up anything.
Regards,
Hans
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -1748,8 +1760,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
> /* Unregister video device */
> video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
> - kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> }
> + free_vpif_objs()
> return 0;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe()
2019-06-03 11:55 ` Hans Verkuil
@ 2019-06-04 7:15 ` Yang Xiao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yang Xiao @ 2019-06-04 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Verkuil; +Cc: prabhakar.csengg, mchehab, linux-media, LKML
Yes, you are correct. I will fix the issue and resubmit the patch again.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:55 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/19 3:09 PM, Young Xiao wrote:
> > If vpif_probe() fails on vpif_probe_complete(), then memory
> > allocated at initialize_vpif() for global vpif_obj.dev[i]
> > become unreleased.
> >
> > The patch adds deallocation of vpif_obj.dev[i] on the error path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > index b5aacb0..63e6ec4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
> > @@ -1621,6 +1621,14 @@ vpif_capture_get_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static void free_vpif_objs(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < VPIF_DISPLAY_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> > + kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * vpif_probe : This function probes the vpif capture driver
> > * @pdev: platform device pointer
> > @@ -1701,7 +1709,10 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > "registered sub device %s\n",
> > subdevdata->name);
> > }
> > - vpif_probe_complete();
> > + err = vpif_probe_complete();
> > + if (err) {
> > + goto probe_subdev_out;
> > + }
>
> No need for { and } as per kernel coding style.
>
> > } else {
> > vpif_obj.notifier.ops = &vpif_async_ops;
> > err = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev,
> > @@ -1722,6 +1733,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > v4l2_device_unregister(&vpif_obj.v4l2_dev);
> > cleanup:
> > v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup(&vpif_obj.notifier);
> > + free_vpif_objs();
>
> This would break the case where initialize_vpif() returns an error, since
> initialize_vpif already frees these objects on error.
>
> In this case the easiest way of doing this is to just return if initialize_vpif
> returns an error. No need to clean up anything.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > return err;
> > }
> > @@ -1748,8 +1760,8 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device)
> > ch = vpif_obj.dev[i];
> > /* Unregister video device */
> > video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev);
> > - kfree(vpif_obj.dev[i]);
> > }
> > + free_vpif_objs()
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-05 20:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-04 12:26 [PATCH] media: davinci: vpif_capture: fix memory leak in vpif_probe() Young Xiao
2019-06-05 20:20 ` Lad, Prabhakar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-04 7:50 Young Xiao
2019-06-04 8:15 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2019-06-04 8:33 ` Yang Xiao
2019-06-04 8:47 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2019-05-29 13:09 Young Xiao
2019-06-03 11:55 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-06-04 7:15 ` Yang Xiao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).