LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: <Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com>
To: <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] i2c: core: treat EPROBE_DEFER when acquiring SCL/SDA GPIOs
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:33:41 +0000
Message-ID: <15a449fa-d649-846a-e6f2-1540f9581846@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200802170500.GB10193@kunai>

On 02.08.2020 20:05, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
>> Even if I2C bus GPIO recovery is optional, devm_gpiod_get() can return
>> -EPROBE_DEFER, so we should at least treat that. This ends up with
>> i2c_register_adapter() to be able to return -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> index 4ee29fec4e93..f8d9f2048ca8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> @@ -368,15 +368,16 @@ static int i2c_gpio_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   	return i2c_gpio_init_generic_recovery(adap);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> +static int i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   {
>>   	struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *bri = adap->bus_recovery_info;
>>   	char *err_str;
>>   
>>   	if (!bri)
>> -		return;
>> +		return 0;
>>   
>> -	i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap);
>> +	if (i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>   
>>   	if (!bri->recover_bus) {
>>   		err_str = "no recover_bus() found";
>> @@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   			if (gpiod_get_direction(bri->sda_gpiod) == 0)
>>   				bri->set_sda = set_sda_gpio_value;
>>   		}
>> -		return;
>> +		return 0;
> 
> This is correct but I think the code flow is/was confusing. Can you drop
> this 'return' and use 'else if' for the next code block? I think this is
> more readable.

Ok, it makes sense. Should I make a separate patch for this only?
One more question, should we keep:
if (!bri->set_sda && !bri->get_sda) {
	err_str = "either get_sda() or set_sda() needed";
	goto err;
}
?
Without {get/set}_sda we won't be able to generate stop commands and 
possibly check if the bus is free, but we can still generate the SCL 
clock pulses.

> 
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (bri->recover_bus == i2c_generic_scl_recovery) {
>> @@ -407,10 +408,12 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	return;
>> +	return 0;
>>    err:
>>   	dev_err(&adap->dev, "Not using recovery: %s\n", err_str);
>>   	adap->bus_recovery_info = NULL;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
> 
> 'return -EINVAL;' I'd suggest.

OK

> 
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>> @@ -1476,7 +1479,9 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   			 "Failed to create compatibility class link\n");
>>   #endif
>>   
>> -	i2c_init_recovery(adap);
>> +	res = i2c_init_recovery(adap);
>> +	if (res == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +		goto out_link;
> 
> Please move 'i2c_init_recovery' above the class-link creation. It
> shouldn't make a difference but we can skip the extra label and the
> ifdeffery.

Ok. Perhaps I should also move the debug print with the registered 
adapter after calling i2c_init_recovery().

> 
>>   
>>   	/* create pre-declared device nodes */
>>   	of_i2c_register_devices(adap);
>> @@ -1493,6 +1498,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   
>> +out_link:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT
>> +	class_compat_remove_link(i2c_adapter_compat_class, &adap->dev,
>> +				 adap->dev.parent);
>> +#endif
>>   out_reg:
>>   	init_completion(&adap->dev_released);
>>   	device_unregister(&adap->dev);
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>

Do you want me to integrate this patch in the previous one?

Best regards,
Codrin

  reply index

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 14:19 [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-binding: i2c: add generic properties for " Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-07-05 21:19   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 19:39     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-24 20:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-27 10:44         ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-27 10:50           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-30  9:00             ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 14:16               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-08-03 16:42                 ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-15 19:21   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] i2c: core: add generic I2C GPIO recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 16:54   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 13:27     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:49       ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] i2c: core: treat EPROBE_DEFER when acquiring SCL/SDA GPIOs Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:05   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:33     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu [this message]
2020-08-03 16:59       ` wsa
2020-06-19 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] i2c: at91: Move to generic GPIO bus recovery Codrin Ciubotariu
2020-08-02 17:08   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-08-03 15:42     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-08-03 16:59       ` wsa
2020-08-26  6:14       ` Wolfram Sang
2020-09-04  8:55         ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-09-04  9:20           ` Wolfram Sang
2020-07-05 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] i2c: core: add " Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15a449fa-d649-846a-e6f2-1540f9581846@microchip.com \
    --to=codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com \
    --cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git