LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: poll_state: Add time limit to poll_idle()
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:08:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612418.9UMGjv7DaP@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314120450.GT4043@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 1:04:50 PM CET Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:36:27AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > If poll_idle() is allowed to spin until need_resched() returns 'true',
> > it may actually spin for a much longer time than expected by the idle
> > governor, since set_tsk_need_resched() is not always called by the
> > timer interrupt handler. If that happens, the CPU may spend much
> > more time than anticipated in the "polling" state.
> >
> > To prevent that from happening, limit the time of the spinning loop
> > in poll_idle().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > -> v2: After additional testing reduce POLL_IDLE_TIME_CHECK_COUNT to 1000.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> > @@ -5,16 +5,31 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> > +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/sched/idle.h>
> >
> > +#define POLL_IDLE_TIME_CHECK_COUNT 1000
> > +#define POLL_IDLE_TIME_LIMIT (TICK_NSEC / 16)
> > +
> > static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
> > {
> > + ktime_t start = ktime_get();
>
> I would recoomend not using ktime_get(), imagine the 'joy' if that
> happens to be the HPET.
>
> > local_irq_enable();
> > if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> > + unsigned int time_check_counter = 0;
> > +
> > + while (!need_resched()) {
> > cpu_relax();
> > + if (time_check_counter++ < POLL_IDLE_TIME_CHECK_COUNT)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + time_check_counter = 0;
> > + if (ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start) > POLL_IDLE_TIME_LIMIT)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > current_clr_polling();
>
> Since the idle loop is strictly per-cpu, you can use regular
> sched_clock() here. Something like:
>
> u64 start = sched_clock();
>
> local_irq_enable();
> if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> while (!need_resched()) {
> cpu_relax();
>
> if (sched_clock() - start > POLL_IDLE_TIME_LIMIT)
> break;
> }
> }
> current_clr_polling();
Good idea!
> On x86 we don't have to use that time_check_counter thing, sched_clock()
> is really cheap, not sure if it makes sense on other platforms.
Let's do it the way you suggested, if there are issues with it, we
can still add the counter later.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 9:36 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-14 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-14 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-14 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-03-22 16:32 ` Rik van Riel
2018-03-22 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-27 16:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-27 18:02 ` Rik van Riel
2018-03-27 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-22 19:11 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-23 3:19 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-23 8:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-23 9:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-23 21:30 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-24 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1612418.9UMGjv7DaP@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: poll_state: Add time limit to poll_idle()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).