From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB579C432BE for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B160D61179 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243160AbhHFBKq (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:10:46 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56190 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243156AbhHFBKm (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 21:10:42 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8D9161186; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 01:10:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1628212227; bh=z2LbFuvGZ9oYZoczOAsC1gtln5yj7whAdrI8YVYi4+A=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=YJcnG6Iy7n5jROmDuxFiUyasnuF7HQfKIGLo966QXl5a8/k8h74Z0Mn3eyqYM+Jjb kdiyVwcXSmmG6ycFGZMPZs0VgH92QovxdhaflWzLZI+j/xy/aYXoqnwWcowYHDEBfE Ft31AoL9u40VqDNn6FYuwVr9Low05VH0abyhuhDLGnujeikQpU+NQ/RZryhH2ZTppB esbCz7qPhPpqWzN2/IcE3NvxMiWnylINKBbJ8Ph2W43vnn67q8i+kyk97yBLDRnEki 32w1AyQHcm9fLRpP5WMJUdsUmn8TL/w1MK25i5yW8UPappQM8irzkvRT3gB61AIvsU lJ8aMyKE8tBww== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210702225145.2643303-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> References: <20210702225145.2643303-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20210702225145.2643303-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Switch to clk_divider.determine_rate From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Blumenstingl , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com To: Martin Blumenstingl , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 18:10:26 -0700 Message-ID: <162821222682.19113.14294600581719716007@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Martin Blumenstingl (2021-07-02 15:51:43) > .determine_rate is meant to replace .round_rate in CCF in the future. > Switch over to .determine_rate now that clk_divider_ops has gained > support for that. >=20 > Cc: Maxime Coquelin > Cc: Alexandre Torgue > Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl > --- Applied to clk-next