LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
	like.xu.linux@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	wei.w.wang@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:56:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629791777-16430-5-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1629791777-16430-1-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com>

From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>

The number of Arch LBR entries available is determined by the value
in host MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH.DEPTH. The supported LBR depth values are
enumerated in CPUID.(EAX=01CH, ECX=0):EAX[7:0]. For each bit "n" set
in this field, the MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH.DEPTH value of "8*(n+1)" is
supported.

On a guest write to MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, all LBR entries are reset to 0.
KVM writes guest requested value to the native ARCH_LBR_DEPTH MSR
(this is safe because the two values will be the same) when the Arch LBR
records MSRs are pass-through to the guest.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c    | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 974cbfb1eefe..a93b77b10933 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -515,6 +515,9 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
 	 * redundant check before cleanup if guest don't use vPMU at all.
 	 */
 	u8 event_count;
+
+	/* Guest arch lbr depth supported by KVM. */
+	u64 kvm_arch_lbr_depth;
 };
 
 struct kvm_pmu_ops;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 9efc1a6b8693..cddc23689846 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static bool intel_pmu_is_valid_lbr_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index)
 static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	switch (msr) {
 	case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
@@ -220,6 +220,10 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 	case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
 		ret = pmu->version > 1;
 		break;
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+			ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
+		break;
 	default:
 		ret = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0) ||
 			get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0) ||
@@ -348,10 +352,26 @@ static bool intel_pmu_handle_lbr_msrs_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if the requested depth value the same as that of host.
+ * When guest/host depth are different, the handling would be tricky,
+ * so now only max depth is supported for both host and guest.
+ */
+static bool arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 depth)
+{
+	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+
+	if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		return false;
+
+	return (depth == pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth);
+}
+
 static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
 	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+	struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
 	u32 msr = msr_info->index;
 
 	switch (msr) {
@@ -367,6 +387,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
 		msr_info->data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl;
 		return 0;
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+		msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
 		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -393,8 +416,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
 	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+	struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
 	u32 msr = msr_info->index;
 	u64 data = msr_info->data;
+	u64 lbr_ctl;
 
 	switch (msr) {
 	case MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL:
@@ -427,6 +452,30 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 			return 0;
 		}
 		break;
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+		if (!arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(vcpu, data))
+			return 1;
+		lbr_desc->records.nr = data;
+		if (msr_info->host_initiated)
+			return 0;
+
+		rdmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL, lbr_ctl);
+		/*
+		 * If the host is using Arch LBR on this CPU at this point,
+		 * then reject guest's request.
+		 */
+		if (lbr_ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN && !lbr_desc->event)
+			return 1;
+		/* If the event has been sched out, we don't write the msr.*/
+		if (lbr_desc->event &&
+		    lbr_desc->event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
+			return 1;
+		/*
+		 * Otherwise, guest is programming the depth MSR or reset lbr records
+		 * via short-cut, then allow write to the MSR.
+		 */
+		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, lbr_desc->records.nr);
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
 		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -540,6 +589,18 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (lbr_desc->records.nr)
 		bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_VLBR, 1);
+
+	if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		return;
+
+	entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 28, 0);
+	if (entry) {
+		/*
+		 * The depth mask in CPUID has been forced by KVM to that of host
+		 * supported value when user-space sets guest CPUID.
+		 */
+		pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth = fls(entry->eax & 0xff) * 8;
+	}
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24  7:56 [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` Yang Weijiang [this message]
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-25  7:59   ` kernel test robot
2021-08-27  1:06   ` kernel test robot
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactor code to support " Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] KVM: nVMX: Add necessary Arch LBR settings for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Clear Arch LBREn bit before inject #DB to guest Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15  0:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15  1:28     ` Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15  2:05       ` Like Xu
2021-10-15 14:49         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-07  3:26 ` [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1629791777-16430-5-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v8 04/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).