LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
	like.xu.linux@gmail.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	wei.w.wang@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for guest Arch LBR
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:56:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1629791777-16430-6-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1629791777-16430-1-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com>

From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>

Arch LBRs are enabled by setting MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL.LBREn to 1. A new guest
state field named "Guest IA32_LBR_CTL" is added to enhance guest LBR usage.
When guest Arch LBR is enabled, a guest LBR event will be created like the
model-specific LBR does. Clear guest LBR enable bit on host PMI handling so
guest can see expected config.

On processors that support Arch LBR, MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR[bit 0] has no
meaning. It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
Like IA32_DEBUGCTL, IA32_ARCH_LBR_CTL msr is also preserved on INIT.

Regardless of the Arch LBR or legacy LBR, when the LBR_EN bit 0 of the
corresponding control MSR is set to 1, LBR recording will be enabled.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c      |  2 --
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h       |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c     | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c           |  9 +++++
 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index ceff16eb4bcb..d6773a200c70 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -168,8 +168,6 @@ enum {
 	 ARCH_LBR_RETURN		|\
 	 ARCH_LBR_OTHER_BRANCH)
 
-#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK			0x7f000e
-
 static void intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
 
 static __always_inline bool is_lbr_call_stack_bit_set(u64 config)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index a7c413432b33..04059e8ed115 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
 #define LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE		(0xfull << LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE_OFFSET)
 
 #define MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL		0x000014ce
+#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK		0x7f000e
 #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN		BIT(0)
 #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET		1
 #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL		(0x3ull << ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index 0ffaa3156a4e..ea3be961cc8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
 	GUEST_BNDCFGS_HIGH              = 0x00002813,
 	GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL		= 0x00002814,
 	GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL_HIGH	= 0x00002815,
+	GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL		= 0x00002816,
+	GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL_HIGH		= 0x00002817,
 	HOST_IA32_PAT			= 0x00002c00,
 	HOST_IA32_PAT_HIGH		= 0x00002c01,
 	HOST_IA32_EFER			= 0x00002c02,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index cddc23689846..db055b352de0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include "pmu.h"
 
 #define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT      (MSR_IA32_PMC0 - MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)
+#define KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK  (ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK | ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN)
 
 static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping intel_arch_events[] = {
 	/* Index must match CPUID 0x0A.EBX bit vector */
@@ -221,6 +222,7 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
 		ret = pmu->version > 1;
 		break;
 	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
 		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
 			ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
 		break;
@@ -367,6 +369,35 @@ static bool arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 depth)
 	return (depth == pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth);
 }
 
+#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK   GENMASK_ULL(22, 16)
+
+static bool arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 ctl)
+{
+	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
+
+	if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		return false;
+
+	if (ctl & ~KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK)
+		goto warn;
+
+	entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1c, 0);
+	if (!entry)
+		return false;
+
+	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(0)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL))
+		return false;
+	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(2)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_STACK))
+		return false;
+	if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(1)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK))
+		return false;
+	return true;
+warn:
+	pr_warn_ratelimited("kvm: vcpu-%d: invalid arch lbr ctl.\n",
+			    vcpu->vcpu_id);
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 {
 	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
@@ -390,6 +421,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
 		msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
 		return 0;
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
+		msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL);
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
 		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -476,6 +510,15 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		 */
 		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, lbr_desc->records.nr);
 		return 0;
+	case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
+		if (!arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(vcpu, data))
+			break;
+
+		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, data);
+		if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !lbr_desc->event &&
+		    (data & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN))
+			intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
 		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
@@ -665,12 +708,16 @@ static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 static void intel_pmu_legacy_freezing_lbrs_on_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	u64 data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
+	u32 lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL;
 
-	if (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI) {
-		data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
-		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
-	}
+	if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI))
+		return;
+
+	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
+	    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+		lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL;
+
+	vmcs_write64(lbr_ctl_field, vmcs_read64(lbr_ctl_field) & ~0x1ULL);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 927a552393b9..e8df44faf900 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2002,6 +2002,13 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 						VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS)
 			get_vmcs12(vcpu)->guest_ia32_debugctl = data;
 
+		/*
+		 * For Arch LBR, IA32_DEBUGCTL[bit 0] has no meaning.
+		 * It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
+		 */
+		if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+			data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
+
 		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
 		if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.event &&
 		    (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
@@ -4441,6 +4448,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
 		vmcs_writel(GUEST_SYSENTER_ESP, 0);
 		vmcs_writel(GUEST_SYSENTER_EIP, 0);
 		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, 0);
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
+			vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
 	}
 
 	kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, X86_EFLAGS_FIXED);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24  7:56 [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` Yang Weijiang [this message]
2021-08-25  7:59   ` [PATCH v8 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " kernel test robot
2021-08-27  1:06   ` kernel test robot
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactor code to support " Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 07/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] KVM: nVMX: Add necessary Arch LBR settings for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Clear Arch LBREn bit before inject #DB to guest Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change Yang Weijiang
2021-08-24  7:56 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15  0:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-15  1:28     ` Yang Weijiang
2021-10-15  2:05       ` Like Xu
2021-10-15 14:49         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-07  3:26 ` [PATCH v8 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1629791777-16430-6-git-send-email-weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v8 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for guest Arch LBR' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).