LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>
To: Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] message: fusion: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:18:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1631863097-10280-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com> (raw)
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
While at it, some 'dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask()' have been
updated to a much less verbose 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()'.
This type of patches has been going on for a long time, I plan to
clean it up in the near future. If needed, see post from
Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>
---
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
index 7f7abc9..c255d8a
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
@@ -1666,16 +1666,12 @@ mpt_mapresources(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
const uint64_t required_mask = dma_get_required_mask
(&pdev->dev);
if (required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
- && !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
+ && dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 64 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
ioc->name));
- } else if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ } else if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 32 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
@@ -1686,9 +1682,7 @@ mpt_mapresources(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
goto out_pci_release_region;
}
} else {
- if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 32 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
@@ -4452,9 +4446,7 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
*/
if (ioc->pcidev->device == MPI_MANUFACTPAGE_DEVID_SAS1078 &&
ioc->dma_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(35)) {
- if (!pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(35);
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"setting 35 bit addressing for "
@@ -4462,10 +4454,7 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
ioc->name));
} else {
/*Reseting DMA mask to 64 bit*/
- pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT
"failed setting 35 bit addressing for "
@@ -4600,9 +4589,8 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
alloc_dma += ioc->reply_sz;
}
- if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) && !pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- ioc->dma_mask) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- ioc->dma_mask))
+ if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) &&
+ !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, ioc->dma_mask))
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"restoring 64 bit addressing\n", ioc->name));
@@ -4625,9 +4613,8 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
ioc->sense_buf_pool = NULL;
}
- if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) && !pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
+ if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) &&
+ !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"restoring 64 bit addressing\n", ioc->name));
--
2.7.4
reply other threads:[~2021-09-17 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1631863097-10280-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com \
--to=wangqing@vivo.com \
--cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).