From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750959AbWHQGt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751212AbWHQGt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:27 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40071 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959AbWHQGt0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:49:26 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: "Jesper Juhl" Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:49:18 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17636.4462.975774.528003@cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [NFS] 2.6.17.8 - do_vfs_lock: VFS is out of sync with lock manager! In-Reply-To: message from Jesper Juhl on Tuesday August 8 References: <9a8748490608080739w2e14e5ceg44a7bf0a3b475704@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D I have some webservers that have recently started reporting the > following message in their logs : > > do_vfs_lock: VFS is out of sync with lock manager! I can imagine that happening if you mount with '-o nolocks'. Then a non-blocking lock could cause that message (I think). Can you conform that you aren't using 'nolocks'. Thanks, NeilBrown