LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
	ast@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: fix 64-bit division
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 18:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17967788-2811-892b-0126-1bc49a5b9929@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf737cf-a0c4-b542-8d37-fd9cdfe7101d@infradead.org>

On 05/07/2018 08:25 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/07/2018 10:43 AM, Björn Töpel wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
>>
>> i386 builds report:
>>   net/xdp/xdp_umem.o: In function `xdp_umem_reg':
>>   xdp_umem.c:(.text+0x47e): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>>
>> This fix uses div_u64 instead of the GCC built-in.
>>
>> Fixes: c0c77d8fb787 ("xsk: add user memory registration support sockopt")
>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
> 
> I don't know why the subject says xsk (instead of xdp), but anyway:
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Applied to bpf-next, thanks everyone!

      reply	other threads:[~2018-05-09 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-07  5:31 linux-next: Tree for May 7 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-07 12:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-07 12:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-07 16:17 ` linux-next: Tree for May 7 (net/xdp) Randy Dunlap
2018-05-07 17:43   ` [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: fix 64-bit division Björn Töpel
2018-05-07 18:25     ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-09 16:13       ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17967788-2811-892b-0126-1bc49a5b9929@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: fix 64-bit division' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).