From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753110AbeDSNW7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:22:59 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:34319 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752703AbeDSNW5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:22:57 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+rafxUBGYcpSWx6zQjHiN0ScYnFAQu5NrOV449odtneSauoEG3QCXzuSK9q2g+HNSykzD6xQ== Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Input: xen-kbdfront - allow better run-time configuration To: Juergen Gross , Jason Andryuk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, open list , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, lyan@suse.com, Boris Ostrovsky , andrii_chepurnyi@epam.com, Oleksandr Andrushchenko References: <20180418150445.9805-1-andr2000@gmail.com> <2bff035e-303e-d644-5f51-5e64150c097c@gmail.com> <5ed20b99-263d-d906-9349-d064eead36ad@gmail.com> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko Message-ID: <1d737998-6b90-ba33-bafa-8a8d4dc568d8@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:22:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/19/2018 04:19 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/04/18 15:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> On 04/19/2018 04:10 PM, Jason Andryuk wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko >>> wrote: >>>> Ok, so I'll send v2 with the following changes: >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>> b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>> index a3306aad40b0..d8cca212f737 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c >>>> @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ module_param_array(ptr_size, int, NULL, 0444); >>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(ptr_size, >>>>          "Pointing device width, height in pixels (default 800,600)"); >>>> >>>> -static unsigned int no_ptr_dev; >>>> -module_param(no_ptr_dev, uint, 0); >>>> +static bool no_ptr_dev; >>>> +module_param(no_ptr_dev, bool, 0); >>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_ptr_dev, >>>>          "If set then no virtual pointing device exposed to the guest"); >>>> >>>> -static unsigned int no_kbd_dev; >>>> -module_param(no_kbd_dev, uint, 0); >>>> +static bool no_kbd_dev; >>>> +module_param(no_kbd_dev, bool, 0); >>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_kbd_dev, >>>>          "If set then no virtual keyboard device exposed to the guest"); >>> I prefer direct logic over inverse logic.  Maybe just use kbd_dev, >>> default to true, but allow it to be set off? >>> >>> static bool kbd_dev = true; >>> module_param(kbd_dev, bool, 0); >> I have no preference here, either way works for me >> Juergen, what do you think about the above? > I really have no preference here. What should be taken into account is > that boolean parameters don't need a value, meaning "true" in that case. > This would make no sense for "kbd_dev" as it wouldn't change the > default. Then I'll go with the diff above, e.g. boolean no_{kbd|ptr})dev > Juergen