LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 -- __builtin_expect
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:38:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010918143827.A16003@gruyere.muc.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010918031813.57E1062ABC@oscar.casa.dyndns.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <E15jBLy-0008UF-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <9o6j9l$461$1@cesium.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <oup4rq0bwww.fsf_-_@pigdrop.muc.suse.de> <jeelp4rbtf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <jeelp4rbtf.fsf@sykes.suse.de>; from schwab@suse.de on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:13:48PM +0200
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:13:48PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
>
> |> +#define likely(x) __builtin_expect((x), !0)
>
> IMHO, this should better be written as
>
> #define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
>
> because x is not required to be pure boolean, so any nonzero value of x is
> as likely as 1.
Good point. I somehow assumed that __builtin_expect would just signify
a boolean, but if I read gcc source correctly this was wrong.
Here is an updated patch.
-Andi
--- mm/slab.c-LIKELY Tue Sep 18 03:37:30 2001
+++ mm/slab.c Tue Sep 18 11:26:43 2001
@@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@
objp = slabp->s_mem + slabp->free*cachep->objsize;
slabp->free=slab_bufctl(slabp)[slabp->free];
- if (__builtin_expect(slabp->free == BUFCTL_END, 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(slabp->free == BUFCTL_END)) {
list_del(&slabp->list);
list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_full);
}
@@ -1264,11 +1264,11 @@
\
slabs_partial = &(cachep)->slabs_partial; \
entry = slabs_partial->next; \
- if (__builtin_expect(entry == slabs_partial, 0)) { \
+ if (unlikely(entry == slabs_partial)) { \
struct list_head * slabs_free; \
slabs_free = &(cachep)->slabs_free; \
entry = slabs_free->next; \
- if (__builtin_expect(entry == slabs_free, 0)) \
+ if (unlikely(entry == slabs_free)) \
goto alloc_new_slab; \
list_del(entry); \
list_add(entry, slabs_partial); \
@@ -1291,11 +1291,11 @@
/* Get slab alloc is to come from. */
slabs_partial = &(cachep)->slabs_partial;
entry = slabs_partial->next;
- if (__builtin_expect(entry == slabs_partial, 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(entry == slabs_partial)) {
struct list_head * slabs_free;
slabs_free = &(cachep)->slabs_free;
entry = slabs_free->next;
- if (__builtin_expect(entry == slabs_free, 0))
+ if (unlikely(entry == slabs_free))
break;
list_del(entry);
list_add(entry, slabs_partial);
@@ -1436,11 +1436,11 @@
/* fixup slab chains */
{
int inuse = slabp->inuse;
- if (__builtin_expect(!--slabp->inuse, 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(!--slabp->inuse)) {
/* Was partial or full, now empty. */
list_del(&slabp->list);
list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_free);
- } else if (__builtin_expect(inuse == cachep->num, 0)) {
+ } else if (unlikely(inuse == cachep->num)) {
/* Was full. */
list_del(&slabp->list);
list_add(&slabp->list, &cachep->slabs_partial);
--- mm/vmscan.c-LIKELY Tue Sep 18 03:37:30 2001
+++ mm/vmscan.c Tue Sep 18 11:22:09 2001
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@
while (__max_scan && (entry = lru->prev) != lru) {
struct page * page;
- if (__builtin_expect(current->need_resched, 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(current->need_resched)) {
spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
schedule();
spin_lock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@
page = list_entry(entry, struct page, lru);
- if (__builtin_expect(!PageInactive(page) && !PageActive(page), 0))
+ if (unlikely(!PageInactive(page) && !PageActive(page)))
BUG();
if (PageTestandClearReferenced(page)) {
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
list_del(entry);
list_add_tail(entry, &inactive_local_lru);
- if (__builtin_expect(!memclass(page->zone, classzone), 0))
+ if (unlikely(!memclass(page->zone, classzone)))
continue;
__max_scan--;
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@
* The page is locked. IO in progress?
* Move it to the back of the list.
*/
- if (__builtin_expect(TryLockPage(page), 0))
+ if (unlikely(TryLockPage(page)))
continue;
if (PageDirty(page) && is_page_cache_freeable(page)) {
@@ -456,10 +456,10 @@
}
}
- if (__builtin_expect(!page->mapping, 0))
+ if (unlikely(!page->mapping))
BUG();
- if (__builtin_expect(!spin_trylock(&pagecache_lock), 0)) {
+ if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&pagecache_lock))) {
/* we hold the page lock so the page cannot go away from under us */
spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@
}
/* point of no return */
- if (__builtin_expect(!PageSwapCache(page), 1))
+ if (likely(!PageSwapCache(page)))
__remove_inode_page(page);
else
__delete_from_swap_cache(page);
--- mm/page_alloc.c-LIKELY Tue Sep 18 03:37:30 2001
+++ mm/page_alloc.c Tue Sep 18 11:26:44 2001
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
return page;
zone = zonelist->zones;
- if (__builtin_expect(freed, 1)) {
+ if (likely(freed)) {
for (;;) {
zone_t *z = *(zone++);
if (!z)
--- include/linux/kernel.h-LIKELY Tue Sep 18 11:12:20 2001
+++ include/linux/kernel.h Tue Sep 18 14:35:17 2001
@@ -171,4 +171,14 @@
char _f[20-2*sizeof(long)-sizeof(int)]; /* Padding: libc5 uses this.. */
};
+
+/* This loses on a few early 2.96 snapshots, but hopefully nobody uses them anymore. */
+#if __GNUC__ > 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && _GNUC_MINOR__ == 96)
+#define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
+#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x), 0)
+#else
+#define likely(x) (x)
+#define unlikely(x) (x)
+#endif
+
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010918031813.57E1062ABC@oscar.casa.dyndns.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <E15jBLy-0008UF-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <9o6j9l$461$1@cesium.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-09-18 10:44 ` Andi Kleen
2001-09-18 11:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-09-18 12:38 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2001-09-26 23:54 ` James Antill
2001-09-27 12:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-09-27 15:41 ` James Antill
2001-09-27 16:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-10-04 18:52 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-08 6:17 ` James Antill
2001-09-18 20:11 ` Horst von Brand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010918143827.A16003@gruyere.muc.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--subject='Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 -- __builtin_expect' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).