LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Jelson <jelson@circlemud.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:38:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011015143840.G4269@kushida.jlokier.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011002204836.B3026@bug.ucw.cz> <200110022237.f92Mbrk28387@cambot.lecs.cs.ucla.edu> <20011005205136.A1272@elf.ucw.cz> <m1n132x4qg.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> <20011008122013.B38@toy.ucw.cz> <m1wv1zqk37.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> <20011014081233.A31752@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20011014081233.A31752@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>; from pavel@suse.cz on Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 08:12:34AM +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> I do not think tty/pty pair does cut it for AT emulation. Can you
> really emulate all neccessary features using pty/tty?
Remember that if you go for a full user-space driver, you have to
duplicate the kernel's tty layer to emulate everything. For full
compatibility, that means emulating all the ancient serial and tty
ioctls properly including Linux-specific ones, SYSV-style ones,
BSD-style ones etc.
That's already been done _and_ tested in the kernel over the years.
While repeating that in user space is possible, I suspect that a pty/tty
interface would end up providing better compatibility (in practice) for
all the different, special and ancient terminal programs. In the cases
where pty/tty doesn't relay enough information to the pty side, we
should look at whether minor changes to the pty driver can fix that.
cheers,
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-15 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-29 1:18 Jeremy Elson
2001-10-01 15:36 ` Jeremy Elson
2001-10-02 18:48 ` Pavel Machek
2001-10-02 22:37 ` Jeremy Elson
2001-10-02 22:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-05 18:51 ` Pavel Machek
2001-10-08 2:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-10-08 2:37 ` linmodems (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices) Jeff Garzik
2001-10-08 12:19 ` Pavel Machek
2001-10-08 19:34 ` Tim Jansen
2001-10-08 12:20 ` [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices Pavel Machek
2001-10-13 21:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-10-14 6:12 ` Pavel Machek
2001-10-15 12:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-10-15 12:38 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2001-10-10 3:55 ` Jeremy Elson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011015143840.G4269@kushida.jlokier.co.uk \
--to=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jelson@circlemud.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--subject='Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).