LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon <>
To: Marco Roeland <>
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <>
Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test10] cpufreq: 2G P4M won't go above 1.2G - cpuinfo_max_freq too low
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:23:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031127121801.GB9098@localhost>

> On Thursday November 27th 2003 Simon wrote:
> > I have a P4 2ghz (in a thinkpad), but it's not running at over about
> > 1.2ghz now.

On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:18 pm, Marco Roeland wrote:
> It turned out to be an ACPI problem. Booting on 2.6 with "acpi=off" lead
> to the correct 1.8GHz determination instead of only 1.2GHz, but no working
> ACPI of course. On 2.4.21 booting either with of without ACPI made no
> difference and lead on both occasions to 1.8GHz.
> After upgrading the BIOS to the latest version I could finally run 2.6
> with ACPI and at full capacity.

I tried both of these, but the BIOS update changed nothing, and "acpi=off" 
just switched off acpi. The only thing I can tell is that my battery icon in 
KDE has disappeared... My CPU speed remains unaffected. *sigh*

On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:15 pm, Marc Staudacher wrote off-list:
> Is it the case that you're running the notebook i) with the battery
> inserted and ii) ac-powered?
> It is custom to IBM Thinkpads that they only run at full speed if it is
> the case that i) and ii).
> According to IBM the battery is necessary because it is possible that
> the power supply does not generate enough energy in certain cases
> (maximal load-scenarios). Thus, the maximal processor speed is
> automatically restricted if the battery is not inserted.
> The ACPI changes between 2.4.21-ac2 and 2.6.0-test10 might account for
> the different behaviour you experience.

Yes, it is. I left my battery at home today, but borrowed one off a colleague. 
Inserting it did not change anything (at least after a minute or so) but 
rebooting with the battery insterted did speed the machine up. Similarly, 
after removing the battery, the CPU stayed at full speed.

Is there anything I can do about this apart from go back to 2.4 (I've grown to 
like CONFIG_PREEMPT too much for that!) or run with the battery in all the 
time? - I've a string of past laptops where the batteries only last 5 minutes 
because of running with battery + ac power all the time, so I've been in the 
habit of always removing it these days... - I've never had a problem running 
it at max speed with 2.4.

Seems that this is a fault of a better implementation of something... But 
"better" to me shouldn't take away choice of cpu speed from the user? ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-27 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-27 11:39 Simon
2003-11-27 12:18 ` Marco Roeland
2003-11-27 13:23   ` Simon [this message]
2003-11-27 13:42     ` Marco Roeland
2003-11-27 14:57       ` Simon
2003-11-27 15:23         ` Marco Roeland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [2.6.0-test10] cpufreq: 2G P4M won'\''t go above 1.2G - cpuinfo_max_freq too low' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).