LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Fendt <fendt@physik.uni-dortmund.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: peculiar problem with 2.6, 8139too + ACPI
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:28:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040514152838.50b53d1f.fendt@physik.uni-dortmund.de> (raw)

Hi folks,

I have the following problem: the 8139too driver produces lots of
overruns and is _very_ slow (but strangely not always; the problem seems
to be site-dependant, too). And here is what is weird: if I artifically
raise the system load (e.g. compile a kernel just for fun), the download
speed grows by at least an order of magnitude.

Machine is an Asus M2400N notebook, Centrino-based, 8139-internal (lspci
says rev.10), kernel revisions tested now are 2.6.0, 2.6.3, 2.6.5. I did
not really test 2.6.6 yet, since I am having problems getting the beast
to work correctly. Distribution is Debian/unstable. My home router
(quite an old machine) is not ACPI capable, so it does not show the
problem (see below), and I effectively have only this one 8139-based
system to test.

After some detective work, I have narrowed the problem down to an
apparent conflict between 8139too and the 'processor' module, and
therefore to the ACPI code, which is AFAIK all-new in 2.6. If I rmmod
the module, the network speed is fine, but I lose the option to use the
'thermal' module. The big question is: has anyone an idea whether this
is a bug in the 8139too driver or in the ACPI code (IOW: is the problem
maybe not-too-new after all and I was just too dumb to find it)? Or in
which direction I should look? I am afraid I am no kernel/driver hacker
(but on the other hand not a totally C newbie, either). I just want to
avoid poking around in the dark and crashing my system in the process,
if possible :-)

Regards,
Robert

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-14 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-14 13:28 Robert Fendt [this message]
     [not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615FB5FE@hdsmsx403.hd.intel.com>
2004-05-15  1:36 ` Len Brown
2004-05-15 23:30   ` Robert Fendt
2004-05-17 10:30   ` Robert Fendt
2004-05-17 18:24     ` Len Brown
2004-05-17 19:10       ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-20 23:53       ` Robert Fendt
2004-05-21  1:16         ` Len Brown
2004-05-27 13:45           ` Robert Fendt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040514152838.50b53d1f.fendt@physik.uni-dortmund.de \
    --to=fendt@physik.uni-dortmund.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: peculiar problem with 2.6, 8139too + ACPI' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).