LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use-before-uninitialized value in ext3(2)_find_ goal
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 12:53:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040519125328.J22989@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084992705.15395.1276.camel@w-ming2.beaverton.ibm.com>; from cmm@us.ibm.com on Wed, May 19, 2004 at 11:51:43AM -0700
* Mingming Cao (cmm@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> + goal = 0;
> down(&ei->truncate_sem);
> if (ext3_find_goal(inode, iblock, chain, partial, &goal) < 0) {
...
> + goal = 0;
> if (ext2_find_goal(inode, iblock, chain, partial, &goal) < 0)
> goto changed;
I know it's a slightly bigger patch, but would it make sense to just enforce
this as part of api? Just a thought...(patch untested)
thanks,
-chris
--- linux-2.6.6-mm3/fs/ext2/inode.c~goal 2004-05-09 19:32:00.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.6-mm3/fs/ext2/inode.c 2004-05-19 12:27:11.968054560 -0700
@@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ static inline int ext2_find_goal(struct
unsigned long *goal)
{
struct ext2_inode_info *ei = EXT2_I(inode);
+ unsigned long _goal = 0;
write_lock(&ei->i_meta_lock);
if (block == ei->i_next_alloc_block + 1) {
ei->i_next_alloc_block++;
@@ -377,10 +378,11 @@ static inline int ext2_find_goal(struct
* failing that at least try to get decent locality.
*/
if (block == ei->i_next_alloc_block)
- *goal = ei->i_next_alloc_goal;
- if (!*goal)
- *goal = ext2_find_near(inode, partial);
+ _goal = ei->i_next_alloc_goal;
+ if (!_goal)
+ _goal = ext2_find_near(inode, partial);
write_unlock(&ei->i_meta_lock);
+ *goal = _goal;
return 0;
}
write_unlock(&ei->i_meta_lock);
--- linux-2.6.6-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c~goal 2004-05-13 11:19:42.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.6-mm3/fs/ext3/inode.c 2004-05-19 12:25:48.441752488 -0700
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int ext3_find_goal(struct inode *
Indirect *partial, unsigned long *goal)
{
struct ext3_inode_info *ei = EXT3_I(inode);
+ unsigned long _goal = 0;
/* Writer: ->i_next_alloc* */
if (block == ei->i_next_alloc_block + 1) {
ei->i_next_alloc_block++;
@@ -474,9 +475,10 @@ static int ext3_find_goal(struct inode *
* failing that at least try to get decent locality.
*/
if (block == ei->i_next_alloc_block)
- *goal = ei->i_next_alloc_goal;
- if (!*goal)
- *goal = ext3_find_near(inode, partial);
+ _goal = ei->i_next_alloc_goal;
+ if (!_goal)
+ _goal = ext3_find_near(inode, partial);
+ *goal = _goal;
return 0;
}
/* Reader: end */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-21 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040519043235.30d47edb.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-05-19 18:51 ` Mingming Cao
2004-05-19 19:53 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-05-19 20:33 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2004-05-19 21:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-05-19 22:32 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040519125328.J22989@build.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] use-before-uninitialized value in ext3(2)_find_ goal' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).