From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265038AbUETJYL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 05:24:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265050AbUETJYK (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 05:24:10 -0400 Received: from monster.roma2.infn.it ([141.108.255.100]:48109 "EHLO monster.roma2.infn.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265038AbUETJYD (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 05:24:03 -0400 From: "Emiliano 'AlberT' Gabrielli" Reply-To: AlberT@SuperAlberT.it Organization: SuperAlberT.it To: DervishD Subject: Re: [OT ML related] Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:23:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jurriaan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200405201109.29864.AlberT@SuperAlberT.it> <20040520092047.GE30708@DervishD> In-Reply-To: <20040520092047.GE30708@DervishD> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200405201123.47576.AlberT@SuperAlberT.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11:20, giovedì 20 maggio 2004, DervishD wrote: > IMHO, adding a string to the subject (I assume that you were > talking about adding the string to the subject and not to the message > body) is not needed and will impose visual clutter. If you cannot (or > don't want to) use procmail, try to do the filtering with your MUA if > it is powerful enough. Obviously I know that I can filter it using the header (I said it in my first post)... but my opinion is that a prepended string in the Subject can be very usefull... I understand that here nobody thinks the same thing, so never mind :-) --