From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265147AbUETOh2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 10:37:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265161AbUETOh2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 10:37:28 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:128 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265147AbUETOh1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 10:37:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:44:01 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200405201344.i4KDi1PC000143@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: "Jinu M." , Cc: , "Surendra I." In-Reply-To: <1118873EE1755348B4812EA29C55A97222FD0D@esnmail.esntechnologies.co.in> References: <1118873EE1755348B4812EA29C55A97222FD0D@esnmail.esntechnologies.co.in> Subject: Re: protecting source code in 2.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > We are not very sure of how to achieve this. > Please help us address this issue. Why? How is the Linux kernel development community supposed to benefit from your device driver? Why not use hardware with free and open source drivers? John.