From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265251AbUETWeJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 18:34:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265289AbUETWeJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 18:34:09 -0400 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:63476 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265251AbUETWeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 18:34:07 -0400 From: Jesse Barnes To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixing sendfile on 64bit architectures Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:33:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <26879984$108499340940abaf81679ba6.07529629@config22.schlund.de> <200405201810.48141.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040520152510.02de52a1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040520152510.02de52a1.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405201833.28362.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:25 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > Me no understand Jesse. > > Removing the ifdefs and letting the linker do the job has the advantage > that the compiler gets to check more code for you. Nevermind, I was confused about the patch. I thought (without looking at it) that arch versions would be hidden in arch code, but now I see that they're just completely unused, so there's little chance for confusion. I'll shut up now. Jesse