From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265221AbUETVf3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 17:35:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265281AbUETVf3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 17:35:29 -0400 Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com ([213.41.134.224]:22170 "EHLO fr.zoreil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265221AbUETVfZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2004 17:35:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 23:29:57 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Laurent Goujon Cc: Rudo Thomas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sluggish performances with FreeBSD Message-ID: <20040520232957.A2172@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <1085080302.7764.20.camel@caribou.no-ip.org> <20040520193406.GA16184@ss1000.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <1085083195.4240.4.camel@caribou.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1085083195.4240.4.camel@caribou.no-ip.org>; from laurent.goujon@online.fr on Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:59:55PM +0200 X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Laurent Goujon : > In ifconfig stats, I have no error, no overruns or dropped packets. > And remove the acpi modules have no effect... - same thing if the acpi module is not inserted _at all_ during the boot ? - how do you stress the network pipe ? - you probably want to provide detailled ethtool/lspci -vx output, (complete) dmesg from the boot sequence and vmstat 1 during your tests. /proc/interrupts can't hurt either Please consider a follow-up of the thread on netdev@oss.sgi.com -- Ueimor