LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	ACPI ML <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	devel@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060830194317.GA9116@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EB12A50964762B4D8111D55B764A845484D316@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:40:16AM -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:

(Added devel@laptop.org to the Cc:)

> While we are at cleaning up the code, I think it will be much better to 
> move out C-state policy out of this acpi code altogether. We should have

That would be helpful. For the One Laptop Per Child project (or whatever 
it's called today), it would be advantageous to run without acpi. At the 
moment that would cost us deeper C states, so an interface to allow a 
platform driver to register and provide the same functionality without 
code duplication would be helpful.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-30 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-30 18:40 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-30 19:43 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2006-08-31 23:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-09-01  0:30     ` [OLPC-devel] " Jim Gettys
2006-09-01  3:53       ` Len Brown
2006-09-01  4:12         ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-01 15:51           ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-01 13:14         ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2006-09-01 21:52         ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-01 22:57           ` Alan Cox
2006-09-04 13:13         ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 13:09       ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 14:31         ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 10:37           ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-06 14:58             ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-12  9:21               ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 18:14                 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-12 18:27                   ` Mitch Bradley
2006-09-12 20:18                   ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-14  9:20                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14  9:18                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 11:29                     ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 15:19             ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Jim Gettys
2006-09-12  9:21               ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-29 20:51 Adam Belay
2006-09-04 12:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05  2:19   ` Adam Belay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060830194317.GA9116@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=abelay@novell.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devel@laptop.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).