LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
@ 2006-11-29 11:13 Jan Beulich
2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-11-29 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
Tighten the requirements on both input to and output from the Dwarf2
unwinder.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-29 10:03:03.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-28 17:18:45.000000000 +0100
@@ -159,12 +159,19 @@ dump_trace_unwind(struct unwind_frame_in
{
struct ops_and_data *oad = (struct ops_and_data *)data;
int n = 0;
+ unsigned long sp = UNW_SP(info);
+ if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
+ return -1;
while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
n++;
oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
break;
+ if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
+ && sp > UNW_SP(info))
+ break;
+ sp = UNW_SP(info);
}
return n;
}
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-29 10:03:18.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c 2006-11-28 17:18:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -225,12 +225,19 @@ static int dump_trace_unwind(struct unwi
{
struct ops_and_data *oad = (struct ops_and_data *)context;
int n = 0;
+ unsigned long sp = UNW_SP(info);
+ if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
+ return -1;
while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
n++;
oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
break;
+ if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
+ && sp > UNW_SP(info))
+ break;
+ sp = UNW_SP(info);
}
return n;
}
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/include/asm-i386/unwind.h 2006-11-29 10:04:04.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/include/asm-i386/unwind.h 2006-11-28 17:20:26.000000000 +0100
@@ -78,17 +78,13 @@ extern asmlinkage int arch_unwind_init_r
void *arg),
void *arg);
-static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(const struct unwind_frame_info *info)
+static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(/*const*/ struct unwind_frame_info *info)
{
-#if 0 /* This can only work when selector register and EFLAGS saves/restores
- are properly annotated (and tracked in UNW_REGISTER_INFO). */
- return user_mode_vm(&info->regs);
-#else
- return info->regs.eip < PAGE_OFFSET
+ return user_mode_vm(&info->regs)
+ || info->regs.eip < PAGE_OFFSET
|| (info->regs.eip >= __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO)
- && info->regs.eip < __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO) + PAGE_SIZE)
+ && info->regs.eip < __fix_to_virt(FIX_VDSO) + PAGE_SIZE)
|| info->regs.esp < PAGE_OFFSET;
-#endif
}
#else
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/include/asm-x86_64/unwind.h 2006-11-29 10:04:06.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/include/asm-x86_64/unwind.h 2006-11-28 17:18:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -87,14 +87,10 @@ extern int arch_unwind_init_running(stru
static inline int arch_unw_user_mode(const struct unwind_frame_info *info)
{
-#if 0 /* This can only work when selector register saves/restores
- are properly annotated (and tracked in UNW_REGISTER_INFO). */
- return user_mode(&info->regs);
-#else
- return (long)info->regs.rip >= 0
+ return user_mode(&info->regs)
+ || (long)info->regs.rip >= 0
|| (info->regs.rip >= VSYSCALL_START && info->regs.rip < VSYSCALL_END)
|| (long)info->regs.rsp >= 0;
-#endif
}
#else
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6/kernel/unwind.c 2006-11-29 10:04:11.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-unwind-more-sanity-checks/kernel/unwind.c 2006-11-28 16:35:58.000000000 +0100
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static const struct {
typedef unsigned long uleb128_t;
typedef signed long sleb128_t;
+#define sleb128abs __builtin_labs
static struct unwind_table {
struct {
@@ -786,7 +787,7 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#define FRAME_REG(r, t) (((t *)frame)[reg_info[r].offs])
const u32 *fde = NULL, *cie = NULL;
const u8 *ptr = NULL, *end = NULL;
- unsigned long pc = UNW_PC(frame) - frame->call_frame;
+ unsigned long pc = UNW_PC(frame) - frame->call_frame, sp;
unsigned long startLoc = 0, endLoc = 0, cfa;
unsigned i;
signed ptrType = -1;
@@ -935,6 +936,9 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
state.dataAlign = get_sleb128(&ptr, end);
if (state.codeAlign == 0 || state.dataAlign == 0 || ptr >= end)
cie = NULL;
+ else if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign))
+ return -EPERM;
else {
retAddrReg = state.version <= 1 ? *ptr++ : get_uleb128(&ptr, end);
/* skip augmentation */
@@ -966,6 +970,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+ if ((UNW_SP(frame) | UNW_FP(frame)) % sizeof(unsigned long))
+ return -EPERM;
top = STACK_TOP(frame->task);
bottom = STACK_BOTTOM(frame->task);
# if FRAME_RETADDR_OFFSET < 0
@@ -1015,6 +1021,7 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
|| state.regs[retAddrReg].where == Nowhere
|| state.cfa.reg >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info)
|| reg_info[state.cfa.reg].width != sizeof(unsigned long)
+ || FRAME_REG(state.cfa.reg, unsigned long) % sizeof(unsigned long)
|| state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long))
return -EIO;
/* update frame */
@@ -1035,6 +1042,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
#else
# define CASES CASE(8); CASE(16); CASE(32); CASE(64)
#endif
+ pc = UNW_PC(frame);
+ sp = UNW_SP(frame);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(state.regs); ++i) {
if (REG_INVALID(i)) {
if (state.regs[i].where == Nowhere)
@@ -1115,6 +1124,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
}
}
+ if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)
+ || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)))
+ return -EIO;
+
return 0;
#undef CASES
#undef FRAME_REG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
2006-11-29 11:13 [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder Jan Beulich
@ 2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-11-29 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 12:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Tighten the requirements on both input to and output from the Dwarf2
> unwinder.
Thanks for doing this.
> while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
> n++;
> oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
> if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
> break;
> + if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> + && sp > UNW_SP(info))
> + break;
Hmm, but that wouldn't catch the case when the SP is completely
corrupted for some reason.
Maybe it would be better to just run a brute force check here like
the old in_exception_stack(). Similar on x86-64.
> + if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
> + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)
> + || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)))
> + return -EIO;
Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know
when dwarf2 is corrupted.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-11-29 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
>> while (unwind(info) == 0 && UNW_PC(info)) {
>> n++;
>> oad->ops->address(oad->data, UNW_PC(info));
>> if (arch_unw_user_mode(info))
>> break;
>> + if ((sp & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) == (UNW_SP(info) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1))
>> + && sp > UNW_SP(info))
>> + break;
>
>Hmm, but that wouldn't catch the case when the SP is completely
>corrupted for some reason.
>Maybe it would be better to just run a brute force check here like
>the old in_exception_stack(). Similar on x86-64.
Correct. Even though I know Linus disagrees here, I'm not sure
I want to do this, as my ultimate goal would be to eliminate the
hand-crafted linking (which we know got broken a few times on
x86-64, because it's so easy to forget about).
Not the least of the reasons for this is that this increases the
chances of stucks.
>> + if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
>> + || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)
>> + || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)))
>> + return -EIO;
>
>Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know
>when dwarf2 is corrupted.
Certainly, will be a follow-up patch.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-12-04 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
>Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know
>when dwarf2 is corrupted.
Here's a patch to do this and some more (applies on firstfloor tree, but
probably not on plain 2.6.19).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
--- linux-2.6.19-ff/kernel/unwind.c 2006-12-04 15:39:48.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.19-ff-unwind-debug-msg/kernel/unwind.c 2006-12-04 14:23:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -137,6 +137,17 @@ struct unwind_state {
static const struct cfa badCFA = { ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info), 1 };
+static unsigned unwind_debug;
+static int __init unwind_debug_setup(char *s)
+{
+ unwind_debug = simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 0);
+ return 1;
+}
+__setup("unwind_debug=", unwind_debug_setup);
+#define dprintk(lvl, fmt, args...) \
+ ((void)(lvl > unwind_debug \
+ || printk(KERN_DEBUG "unwind: " fmt "\n", ##args)))
+
static struct unwind_table *find_table(unsigned long pc)
{
struct unwind_table *table;
@@ -281,6 +292,7 @@ static void __init setup_unwind_table(st
hdrSize = 4 + sizeof(unsigned long) + sizeof(unsigned int)
+ 2 * n * sizeof(unsigned long);
+ dprintk(2, "Binary lookup table size for %s: %lu bytes", table->name, hdrSize);
header = alloc(hdrSize);
if (!header)
return;
@@ -500,13 +512,17 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const
const unsigned long *pul;
} ptr;
- if (ptrType < 0 || ptrType == DW_EH_PE_omit)
+ if (ptrType < 0 || ptrType == DW_EH_PE_omit) {
+ dprintk(1, "Invalid pointer encoding %02X (%p,%p).", ptrType, *pLoc, end);
return 0;
+ }
ptr.p8 = *pLoc;
switch(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_FORM) {
case DW_EH_PE_data2:
- if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p16u + 1))
+ if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p16u + 1)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Data16 overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
if(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed)
value = get_unaligned(ptr.p16s++);
else
@@ -514,8 +530,10 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const
break;
case DW_EH_PE_data4:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
- if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p32u + 1))
+ if (end < (const void *)(ptr.p32u + 1)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Data32 overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
if(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed)
value = get_unaligned(ptr.p32s++);
else
@@ -527,8 +545,10 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u32) != sizeof(value));
#endif
case DW_EH_PE_native:
- if (end < (const void *)(ptr.pul + 1))
+ if (end < (const void *)(ptr.pul + 1)) {
+ dprintk(1, "DataUL overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
value = get_unaligned(ptr.pul++);
break;
case DW_EH_PE_leb128:
@@ -536,10 +556,14 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const
value = ptrType & DW_EH_PE_signed
? get_sleb128(&ptr.p8, end)
: get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end);
- if ((const void *)ptr.p8 > end)
+ if ((const void *)ptr.p8 > end) {
+ dprintk(1, "DataLEB overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
break;
default:
+ dprintk(2, "Cannot decode pointer type %02X (%p,%p).",
+ ptrType, ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
}
switch(ptrType & DW_EH_PE_ADJUST) {
@@ -549,11 +573,16 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const
value += (unsigned long)*pLoc;
break;
default:
+ dprintk(2, "Cannot adjust pointer type %02X (%p,%p).",
+ ptrType, *pLoc, end);
return 0;
}
if ((ptrType & DW_EH_PE_indirect)
- && probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)value, value))
+ && probe_kernel_address((unsigned long *)value, value)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Cannot read indirect value %lx (%p,%p).",
+ value, *pLoc, end);
return 0;
+ }
*pLoc = ptr.p8;
return value;
@@ -702,8 +731,10 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start,
state->label = NULL;
return 1;
}
- if (state->stackDepth >= MAX_STACK_DEPTH)
+ if (state->stackDepth >= MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
+ dprintk(1, "State stack overflow (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
state->stack[state->stackDepth++] = ptr.p8;
break;
case DW_CFA_restore_state:
@@ -718,8 +749,10 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start,
result = processCFI(start, end, 0, ptrType, state);
state->loc = loc;
state->label = label;
- } else
+ } else {
+ dprintk(1, "State stack underflow (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
return 0;
+ }
break;
case DW_CFA_def_cfa:
state->cfa.reg = get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end);
@@ -751,6 +784,7 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start,
break;
case DW_CFA_GNU_window_save:
default:
+ dprintk(1, "Unrecognized CFI op %02X (%p,%p).", ptr.p8[-1], ptr.p8 - 1, end);
result = 0;
break;
}
@@ -766,12 +800,17 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start,
set_rule(*ptr.p8++ & 0x3f, Nowhere, 0, state);
break;
}
- if (ptr.p8 > end)
+ if (ptr.p8 > end) {
+ dprintk(1, "Data overrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
result = 0;
+ }
if (result && targetLoc != 0 && targetLoc < state->loc)
return 1;
}
+ if (result && ptr.p8 < end)
+ dprintk(1, "Data underrun (%p,%p).", ptr.p8, end);
+
return result
&& ptr.p8 == end
&& (targetLoc == 0
@@ -843,6 +882,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
hdr[3]);
}
}
+ if(hdr && !fde)
+ dprintk(3, "Binary lookup for %lx failed.", pc);
if (fde != NULL) {
cie = cie_for_fde(fde, table);
@@ -864,6 +905,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
fde = NULL;
} else
fde = NULL;
+ if(!fde)
+ dprintk(1, "Binary lookup result for %lx discarded.", pc);
}
if (fde == NULL) {
for (fde = table->address, tableSize = table->size;
@@ -895,6 +938,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
if (pc >= startLoc && pc < endLoc)
break;
}
+ if(!fde)
+ dprintk(3, "Linear lookup for %lx failed.", pc);
}
}
if (cie != NULL) {
@@ -928,6 +973,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
if (ptr >= end || *ptr)
cie = NULL;
}
+ if(!cie)
+ dprintk(1, "CIE unusable (%p,%p).", ptr, end);
++ptr;
}
if (cie != NULL) {
@@ -938,9 +985,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
if (state.codeAlign == 0 || state.dataAlign == 0 || ptr >= end)
cie = NULL;
else if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
- || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign))
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Input pointer(s) misaligned (%lx,%lx).",
+ UNW_PC(frame), UNW_SP(frame));
return -EPERM;
- else {
+ } else {
retAddrReg = state.version <= 1 ? *ptr++ : get_uleb128(&ptr, end);
/* skip augmentation */
if (((const char *)(cie + 2))[1] == 'z') {
@@ -954,6 +1003,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
|| reg_info[retAddrReg].width != sizeof(unsigned long))
cie = NULL;
}
+ if(!cie)
+ dprintk(1, "CIE validation failed (%p,%p).", ptr, end);
}
if (cie != NULL) {
state.cieStart = ptr;
@@ -967,6 +1018,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
if ((ptr += augSize) > end)
fde = NULL;
}
+ if(!fde)
+ dprintk(1, "FDE validation failed (%p,%p).", ptr, end);
}
if (cie == NULL || fde == NULL) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
@@ -1025,8 +1078,10 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
|| state.cfa.reg >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info)
|| reg_info[state.cfa.reg].width != sizeof(unsigned long)
|| FRAME_REG(state.cfa.reg, unsigned long) % sizeof(unsigned long)
- || state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long))
+ || state.cfa.offs % sizeof(unsigned long)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Unusable unwind info (%p,%p).", ptr, end);
return -EIO;
+ }
/* update frame */
#ifndef CONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME
if(frame->call_frame
@@ -1051,6 +1106,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
if (REG_INVALID(i)) {
if (state.regs[i].where == Nowhere)
continue;
+ dprintk(1, "Cannot restore register %u (%d).",
+ i, state.regs[i].where);
return -EIO;
}
switch(state.regs[i].where) {
@@ -1059,8 +1116,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
case Register:
if (state.regs[i].value >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info)
|| REG_INVALID(state.regs[i].value)
- || reg_info[i].width > reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width)
+ || reg_info[i].width > reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) {
+ dprintk(1, "Cannot restore register %u from register %lu.",
+ i, state.regs[i].value);
return -EIO;
+ }
switch(reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) {
#define CASE(n) \
case sizeof(u##n): \
@@ -1070,6 +1130,9 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
CASES;
#undef CASE
default:
+ dprintk(1, "Unsupported register size %u (%lu).",
+ reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width,
+ state.regs[i].value);
return -EIO;
}
break;
@@ -1094,12 +1157,17 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
CASES;
#undef CASE
default:
+ dprintk(1, "Unsupported register size %u (%u).",
+ reg_info[i].width, i);
return -EIO;
}
break;
case Value:
- if (reg_info[i].width != sizeof(unsigned long))
+ if (reg_info[i].width != sizeof(unsigned long)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Unsupported value size %u (%u).",
+ reg_info[i].width, i);
return -EIO;
+ }
FRAME_REG(i, unsigned long) = cfa + state.regs[i].value
* state.dataAlign;
break;
@@ -1111,8 +1179,11 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
% sizeof(unsigned long)
|| addr < startLoc
|| addr + sizeof(unsigned long) < addr
- || addr + sizeof(unsigned long) > endLoc)
+ || addr + sizeof(unsigned long) > endLoc) {
+ dprintk(1, "Bad memory location %lx (%lx).",
+ addr, state.regs[i].value);
return -EIO;
+ }
switch(reg_info[i].width) {
#define CASE(n) case sizeof(u##n): \
probe_kernel_address((u##n *)addr, FRAME_REG(i, u##n)); \
@@ -1120,6 +1191,8 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
CASES;
#undef CASE
default:
+ dprintk(1, "Unsupported memory size %u (%u).",
+ reg_info[i].width, i);
return -EIO;
}
}
@@ -1128,9 +1201,15 @@ int unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *fra
}
if (UNW_PC(frame) % state.codeAlign
- || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)
- || (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)))
+ || UNW_SP(frame) % sleb128abs(state.dataAlign)) {
+ dprintk(1, "Output pointer(s) misaligned (%lx,%lx).",
+ UNW_PC(frame), UNW_SP(frame));
return -EIO;
+ }
+ if (pc == UNW_PC(frame) && sp == UNW_SP(frame)) {
+ dprintk(1, "No progress (%lx,%lx).", pc, sp);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
return 0;
#undef CASES
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder
2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-12-06 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Monday 04 December 2006 17:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >Would it be possible to add printks for the EIOs? We want to know
> >when dwarf2 is corrupted.
>
> Here's a patch to do this and some more (applies on firstfloor tree, but
> probably not on plain 2.6.19).
Added thanks
I added Documentation of the new option.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-06 17:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-29 11:13 [PATCH] more sanity checks in Dwarf2 unwinder Jan Beulich
2006-11-29 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-29 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2006-12-04 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2006-12-06 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).