LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:18:48 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070110231848.GS33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701101510520.23052@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:12:02PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> 
> > Well, pdflush appears to be doing very little on both 2.6.18 and
> > 2.6.20-rc3. In both cases kswapd is consuming 10-20% of a CPU and
> > all of the pdflush threads combined (I've seen up to 7 active at
> > once) use maybe 1-2% of cpu time. This occurs regardless of the
> > dirty_ratio setting.
> 
> That sounds a bit much for kswapd. How many nodes? Any cpusets in use?

It's an x86-64 box - an XE 240 - 4 core, 16GB RAM, single node, no cpusets.

> A upper maximum on the number of pdflush threads exists at 8. Are these 
> multiple files or single file transfers?

See the test case i posted - a single file write per filesystem, three
filesystems being written to at once, all on different, unshared block
devices.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-10 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-10 22:37 David Chinner
2007-01-10 23:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-10 23:08   ` David Chinner
2007-01-10 23:12     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-10 23:18       ` David Chinner [this message]
2007-01-10 23:13     ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11  0:31       ` David Chinner
2007-01-11  0:43         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-11  1:06           ` David Chinner
2007-01-11  1:40             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-11  2:57               ` David Chinner
2007-01-11  1:08         ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11  1:24           ` David Chinner
2007-01-11  9:27             ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11 17:51               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-01-12  0:06                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-12  3:04                   ` Christoph Lameter
     [not found]           ` <20070111063555.GB33919298@melbourne.sgi.com>
2007-01-11  9:23             ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11  1:11     ` David Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070110231848.GS33919298@melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --subject='Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).