LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	avi@qumranet.com, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	vojtech@suse.cz, greg@kroah.com,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:21:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070113162108.GQ7469@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adaps9j54dd.fsf@cisco.com>

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 07:32:46AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.20-rc5 compared to 2.6.19
>  > with patches available.
> 
>  > Subject    : KVM: guest crash
>  > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/8/163
>  > Submitter  : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
>  > Handled-By : Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
>  > Patch      : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/280
>  > Status     : patch available
> 
> This is not a regression from 2.6.19, since kvm did not exist in
> 2.6.19.  In any case akpm has the patch and plans to merge it for
> 2.6.20 so I don't think anyone has to worry about this one.

I know, but a bug that is not present in 2.6.19 is a regression. ;-)

More seriously, I know it's a bit borderline to talk about a regression, 
but I think listing things like crashes or compile errors in new 
functionality makes sense - especially in such cases where it's about 
tracking that a patch doesn't miss 2.6.20.

>  - R.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-13 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12 19:27 Linux v2.6.20-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2007-01-12 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-13  2:26   ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-13  3:36   ` Jeff Chua
2007-01-13  3:44     ` Jeff Chua
2007-01-13 20:23       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-01-13 23:58     ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-13  5:01   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-13 13:02     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-14  7:38       ` Jeff Chua
2007-01-14  7:43         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-13  7:11 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-01-13 15:51   ` Damien Wyart
2007-01-13 15:59     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-13 16:38       ` Jon Smirl
2007-01-13 20:55       ` Aaron Sethman
2007-01-14 12:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-16  6:15   ` David Chinner
2007-01-17  3:43     ` David Chinner
2007-01-18 22:55       ` Sami Farin
2007-01-13  7:14 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches Adrian Bunk
2007-01-13 15:32   ` Roland Dreier
2007-01-13 16:21     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-01-18 19:47 ` 2.6.20-rc5: knwon unfixed regressions (v2) (part1) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-18 19:54 ` 2.6.20-rc5: knwon unfixed regressions (v2) (part2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-18 19:59 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-19  1:43   ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-24 15:46 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 15:47 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known unfixed regressions (v3) (part 2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 16:06   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-01-24 16:38     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 16:57       ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-01-24 20:06         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-24 20:45   ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-25 15:32     ` Gerhard Dirschl
2007-01-26 11:13   ` Andrew Clayton
2007-01-24 15:50 ` 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches (v3) Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070113162108.GQ7469@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --subject='Re: 2.6.20-rc5: known regressions with patches' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).